George King
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology
- Co-authors
- A. W. LogueMatthew S. MatellWarren H. MeckLinda ChangEverett H. EllinwoodDaniel AlicataChristine CloakZhiping Xiong
- Topics
- Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (12 papers)Behavioral and Psychological Studies (9 papers)Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaTürkiye
In The Last Decade
George King
33 papers receiving 740 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 245
- Cognitive Neuroscience 232
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 154
- Molecular Biology 97
- Pharmacology 86
Countries citing papers authored by George King
This map shows the geographic impact of George King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George King. The network helps show where George King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George King
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George King. George King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 71 | |
| 6 | Pitavastatin (Livalo) for Hyperlipidemia And Mixed Dyslipidemia: A Novel Therapeutic Agent, or a ‘Me-Too’ Drug? | 1 |
| 7 | 51 | |
| 8 | 42 | |
| 9 | 127 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 60 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 62 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About George King
George King is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Applied Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 768 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (12 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (9 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (51 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (245 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (45 citations). George King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include A. W. Logue, Matthew S. Matell, Warren H. Meck, Linda Chang, Everett H. Ellinwood, Daniel Alicata, Christine Cloak, Zhiping Xiong, Mark R. Hansen and Linda Chang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, FEBS Letters and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.