Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Sharon E. Beatty
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Sharon E. Beatty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sharon E. Beatty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sharon E. Beatty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sharon E. Beatty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sharon E. Beatty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sharon E. Beatty. The network helps show where Sharon E. Beatty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sharon E. Beatty
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sharon E. Beatty.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sharon E. Beatty based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sharon E. Beatty. Sharon E. Beatty is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Spake, Deborah F., Sharon E. Beatty, Beverly K. Brockman, & Tammy Neal Crutchfield. (2003). Consumer Comfort in Service Relationships. Journal of Service Research. 5(4). 316–332.155 indexed citations
10.
Lee, Christina Kwai Choi & Sharon E. Beatty. (2002). Judgements of Relative Influence in Family Decision-Making Using Observations. ACR Asia-Pacific Advances.2 indexed citations
11.
Stradling, Stephen G., Michael E. Meadows, & Sharon E. Beatty. (2001). WHO DRIVES LARGE CARS.1 indexed citations
12.
Stradling, Stephen G., Michael E. Meadows, & Sharon E. Beatty. (2001). CHARACTERISTICS OF SPEEDING, VIOLATING AND THRILL-SEEKING DRIVERS.21 indexed citations
13.
Spake, Deborah F., Sharon E. Beatty, & Changjo Yoo. (1998). Relationship Marketing From the ConsumerS Perspective: a Comparison of Consumers in South Korea and the United States. ACR Asia-Pacific Advances.4 indexed citations
14.
Beatty, Sharon E., et al.. (1998). Impulse buying: Modeling its precursors. Journal of Retailing. 74(2). 161–167.694 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Beatty, Sharon E., et al.. (1995). Customer Relationships With Retail Salespeople: a Conceptual Model and Propositions. ACR North American Advances.9 indexed citations
Beatty, Sharon E., Pamela M. Homer, & Lynn R. Kahle. (1988). Problems With Vals in International Marketing Research: an Example From an Application of the Empirical Mirror Technique. ACR North American Advances.26 indexed citations
18.
Kahle, Lynn R., Sharon E. Beatty, & Patricia F. Kennedy. (1987). Comment on Classically Conditioning Human Consumers. ACR North American Advances.3 indexed citations
19.
Kahle, Lynn R., Pamela M. Homer, & Sharon E. Beatty. (1986). Social Adaptation Theory in Consumer Behavior. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
20.
Helgeson, James G. & Sharon E. Beatty. (1985). An Information Processing Perspective on the Internalization of Price Stimuli. ACR North American Advances.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.