Shari R. Speer

2.5k citations
46 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 18

Shari R. Speer

45 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Shari R. Speer
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 808
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 589
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 828
  • Linguistics and Language 164
  • Language and Linguistics 369
Replace Lise Menn with:
Lise Menn United States
Wilma van Donselaar Netherlands
Juhani Järvikivi Canada
Thomas Berg Germany
Iris Berent United States
Pierre Hallé France
Laura C. Dilley United States
Sónia Frota Portugal
Barbara Höhle Germany
Anthony Shook United States
Shari R. Speer relative to Lise Menn United States Lise Menn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Lise Menn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shari R. Speer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shari R. Speer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shari R. Speer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shari R. Speer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shari R. Speer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shari R. Speer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shari R. Speer. The network helps show where Shari R. Speer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shari R. Speer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shari R. Speer Line = papers co-authored together Shari R. Speer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20233
2 201822
3
Rational use of prosody predicts projection in manner adverb utterances.
20172
4 20162
5 20121
6 201232
7
Prosodic Properties of Contrastive Utterances in Spontaneous Speech.
20111
8
Evaluating prosody in synthetic speech with online (eye-tracking) and offline (rating) methods.
20101
9 201049
10 200819
11 2007180
12 20061
13 20054
14 20042
15 20041
16 20021
17 200240
18 1999239
19 199848
20 1996114

About Shari R. Speer

Shari R. Speer is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (24 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (21 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (15 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (6 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (5 papers), Language Development and Disorders (5 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (808 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (589 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (828 citations). Shari R. Speer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Kjelgaard, Kiwako Ito, Amy J. Schafer, Paul Warren, Charles Clifton, Sam White, Steven Abney, Robert G. Crowder, Melissa K. Jungers and Caroline Palmėr. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Neuropsychologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026