Scott L. Waugh
- Classics top 2%
- Medieval Literature and History 12
- History top 5%
- Scottish History and National Identity 3
- Medieval History and Crusades 1
- Historical and Religious Studies of Rome 1
- Religious studies top 10%
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 1
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 3
-
- Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments 1
-
- Medieval and Early Modern Justice 1
- Co-authors
- Peter DiehlChristopher AllmandCharles R. YoungLynn H. GerberKenneth B. CampbellBarrie D. GrantPaul DryburghNicholas Vincent
- Cited by
- ClassicsHistoryArcheology
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (1 paper)American Journal of Veterinary Research (2 papers)The Economic History Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Scott L. Waugh
16 papers receiving 91 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Classics 70
- History 52
- Archeology 5
- Religious studies 9
- History and Philosophy of Science 7
Countries citing papers authored by Scott L. Waugh
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott L. Waugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott L. Waugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott L. Waugh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott L. Waugh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott L. Waugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott L. Waugh. The network helps show where Scott L. Waugh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Scott L. Waugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 3 | Christendom and its discontents : exclusion, persecution, and rebellion, 1000-1500 | 1996 | 35 |
| 4 | 1992 | 20 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 0 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 16 | |
| 11 | 1986 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1985 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1983 | 0 | |
| 15 | 1983 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1983 | 13 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1980 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1980 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1977 | 5 |
About Scott L. Waugh
Scott L. Waugh is a scholar working on Classics, History and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 145 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (12 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (3 papers), Medieval History and Crusades (1 paper), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (1 paper), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (1 paper), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper) and Medieval and Early Modern Justice (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (70 citations), History (52 citations) and Archeology (5 citations). Scott L. Waugh has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Diehl, Christopher Allmand, Charles R. Young, Lynn H. Gerber, Kenneth B. Campbell, Barrie D. Grant, Paul Dryburgh, Nicholas Vincent and Paul Brand. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, American Journal of Veterinary Research and The Economic History Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.