Journal of British Studies

1.3k papers and 6.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Journal of British Studies in the last decades have received a total of 6.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of British Studies usually cover History (613 papers), Political Science and International Relations (435 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (415 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Economic and Social Studies (348 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (218 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (207 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of British Studies are Linda Colley, Chris Waters, Frank Trentmann, Randall McGowen, Beverly Lemire, Peter Lake, Harro Höpfl, Simon J. Potter, T. H. Breen and Robert Shoemaker.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of British Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of British Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of British Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of British Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of British Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of British Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of British Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025