A. J. Piper

551 citations
10 papers · 127 indexed · h-index 5
Topics
Medieval Literature and History (8 papers)Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers)Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper)

In The Last Decade

A. J. Piper

9 papers receiving 77 citations

Peers

A. J. Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Classics 69
  • History 60
  • Economics and Econometrics 28
  • Language and Linguistics 21
  • Sociology and Political Science 15
Replace Pauline Stafford with:
Pauline Stafford United Kingdom
Alcuin Blamires United Kingdom
D. L. d’Avray United Kingdom
Howard Kaminsky United States
Pierre Riché France
Richard Rex United Kingdom
V. J. Scattergood United Kingdom
Delno C. West United States
Geoffrey Koziol United States
Thomas Malory
A. J. Piper relative to Pauline Stafford United Kingdom Pauline Stafford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Pauline Stafford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. J. Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. J. Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. J. Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. J. Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. J. Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. J. Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. J. Piper. The network helps show where A. J. Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. J. Piper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. J. Piper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. J. Piper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. J. Piper. A. J. Piper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
The Durham Liber vitae : London, British Library, MS Cotton Domitian A.VII : edition and digital facsimile with introduction, codicological, prosopographical and linguistic commentary, and indexes
5
2
Monastic mortality: Durham Priory, 1395-1529 1
3
3 27
4 4
5 2
6 1
7
New science out of old books : studies in manuscripts and early printed books in honour of A.I. Doyle
20
8 3
9 1
10
Medieval Manuscripts In British Libraries
61

About A. J. Piper

A. J. Piper is a scholar working on Classics, History and Language and Linguistics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 127 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (8 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (69 citations), History (60 citations) and Language and Linguistics (21 citations). A. J. Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include N. R. Ker, Andrew G. Watson, David Stone, Richard Beadle, John Hatcher, David Rollason, Arthur Pollard, Brian Roberts, Peter L. Larson and Richard Lomas. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic History Review, The English Historical Review and Viator.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026