Scott Dexter

546 citations
32 papers · 348 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Dexter

30 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

Scott Dexter
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Computer Science Applications 58
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 174
  • Communication 19
  • Safety Research 22
  • Media Technology 22
Replace Yann Riche with:
Yann Riche United States
Ellen Walker United States
Gonzalo Gabriel Méndez Ecuador
Rajan Vaish United States
Marian F. Ursu United Kingdom
Anis Farihan Mat Raffei Malaysia
Giuliana Dettori Italy
Cindy Xiong United States
Ishbel Duncan United Kingdom
Traian Rebedea Romania
Scott Dexter relative to Yann Riche United States Yann Riche's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Yann Riche · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Dexter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Dexter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Dexter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Dexter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Dexter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Dexter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Dexter. The network helps show where Scott Dexter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Scott Dexter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Dexter Line = papers co-authored together Scott Dexter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005113
2 201130
3 200424
4 200819
5 200518
6 200917
7 200315
8 200814
9 20149
10 20099
11 20139
12 20047
13 20117
14 20067
15 20096
16 20075
17
Decoding Liberation: A Philosophical Investigation of Free Software
20075
18 20135
19 20095
20 20104

About Scott Dexter

Scott Dexter is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Safety Research and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 32 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Open Source Software Innovations (8 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (5 papers), Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (4 papers), Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (4 papers), Cryptography and Data Security (3 papers), Digital Media Forensic Detection (3 papers), Digital Games and Media (3 papers) and Mathematics and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (58 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (174 citations), Communication (19 citations), Safety Research (22 citations) and Media Technology (22 citations). Scott Dexter has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ahmet M. Eskicioğlu, Alexander V. Sverdlov, Samir Chopra, Elizabeth Buchanan, Xiaowei Xu, Aaron Kozbelt, John Aycock, David Dittrich, Erin Hvizdak and Peining Tao. Their work appears in journals such as Ethics and Information Technology, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, Mind & Society, Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts and Linear Algebra and its Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact