Sarah Garner

3.9k citations
61 papers · 2.4k · 1 hit paper · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Sarah Garner

56 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Sarah Garner's Hit Papers

Acne vulgaris 2011 · 827 citations
8270+5+10Years since publication250500750

Peers

Sarah Garner
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Dermatology 886
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 38
  • Molecular Medicine 64
  • Economics and Econometrics 349
  • General Health Professions 265
Replace Daniel Vardy with:
Daniel Vardy Israel
Yuyi Wang China
John S. Barbieri United States
Nithya Gogtay India
Yuping Wang China
Surjit Singh India
Renaat Peleman Belgium
Renan Rangel Bonamigo Brazil
Aaron M. Drucker Canada
Peipei Song China
Sarah Garner relative to Daniel Vardy Israel Daniel Vardy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Daniel Vardy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Garner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Garner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Garner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Garner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Garner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Garner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Garner. The network helps show where Sarah Garner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Garner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Garner Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Garner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Acne vulgaris
Hit paper breakdown →
2011827
2 2012127
3 2012122
4 2011119
5 201683
6 201568
7 201563
8 199960
9 201857
10 201557
11 202054
12 201352
13 201447
14 202142
15 201742
16 200542
17 200340
18 200734
19 201333
20
Disease Registers in England
200231

About Sarah Garner

Sarah Garner is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Physiology, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (17 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (13 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (5 papers), Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects (4 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (3 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (3 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (3 papers) and Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (886 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (38 citations), Molecular Medicine (64 citations), Economics and Econometrics (349 citations) and General Health Professions (265 citations). Sarah Garner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Hywel C Williams, Robert P. Dellavalle, Peter Littlejohns, John Newton, C Popescu, E. Anne Eady, Mike Clarke, Jacoline C. Bouvy, Cathy Bennett and Axel Mühlbacher. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, The Lancet, Frontiers in Pharmacology and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact