Beate Wieseler

2.7k citations
37 papers · 1.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Beate Wieseler

35 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Beate Wieseler
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 194
  • Pharmacology 128
  • Economics and Econometrics 311
  • Biological Psychiatry 20
  • Medical Terminology 2
Replace Spencer Phillips Hey with:
Spencer Phillips Hey United States
Bennett Levitan United States
Vance W. Berger United States
Eugenia Cronin United Kingdom
Perrine Janiaud United States
Emily R. Cox Australia
Orestis A. Panagiotou United States
Kurex Sidik United States
Catharine B. Stack United States
Deborah R. Zucker United States
Beate Wieseler relative to Spencer Phillips Hey United States Spencer Phillips Hey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Spencer Phillips Hey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beate Wieseler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beate Wieseler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beate Wieseler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beate Wieseler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beate Wieseler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beate Wieseler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beate Wieseler. The network helps show where Beate Wieseler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beate Wieseler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beate Wieseler Line = papers co-authored together Beate Wieseler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010288
2 2010242
3 2008101
4 201392
5 201282
6 201976
7 200269
8 201962
9 200955
10 202054
11 201048
12 199844
13 202035
14 201531
15 201427
16 202326
17 201526
18 201023
19 201021
20 201520

About Beate Wieseler

Beate Wieseler is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pharmacology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (15 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (8 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (6 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (5 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (5 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (5 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (4 papers) and Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (194 citations), Pharmacology (128 citations), Economics and Econometrics (311 citations), Biological Psychiatry (20 citations) and Medical Terminology (2 citations). Beate Wieseler has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Kaiser, Natalie McGauran, Ulrich Grouven, Julia Kreis, Heike Kölsch, M Kerekeş, Mandy Kromp, Dirk Eyding, Martin Härter and A.T. Schneider. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ, Health Policy, PLoS ONE, BMJ evidence-based medicine and Thorax.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact