Sarah Dunlap

644 total citations
11 papers, 463 citations indexed

About

Sarah Dunlap is a scholar working on Safety Research, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Dunlap has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 463 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Safety Research, 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Sarah Dunlap's work include Career Development and Diversity (5 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (3 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers). Sarah Dunlap is often cited by papers focused on Career Development and Diversity (5 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (3 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers). Sarah Dunlap collaborates with scholars based in United States. Sarah Dunlap's co-authors include Karen C. Wells, John E. Lochman, Joan M. Barth, Tammy D. Barry, Debra Moehle McCallum, John C. Lusth, S. L. Burkett, Sushma Kotru, Viola L. Acoff and Cassandra D. Ford and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Sex Roles and Journal of School Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Dunlap

10 papers receiving 424 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Dunlap United States 7 244 217 132 74 70 11 463
Marie‐Hélène Véronneau Canada 8 304 1.2× 178 0.8× 242 1.8× 98 1.3× 72 1.0× 24 564
Kristen Schoff United States 7 330 1.4× 219 1.0× 119 0.9× 38 0.5× 121 1.7× 8 518
Nicole Renick Thomson United States 11 135 0.6× 118 0.5× 167 1.3× 118 1.6× 81 1.2× 18 400
Robyn S. Hess United States 13 402 1.6× 358 1.6× 145 1.1× 88 1.2× 114 1.6× 35 645
Amy C. Hartl United States 11 254 1.0× 111 0.5× 204 1.5× 43 0.6× 101 1.4× 17 460
Amy L. Madigan United States 7 263 1.1× 349 1.6× 120 0.9× 25 0.3× 148 2.1× 8 565
Tiago Ferreira Portugal 11 269 1.1× 209 1.0× 152 1.2× 20 0.3× 187 2.7× 40 541
Lí­gia Monteiro Portugal 14 405 1.7× 149 0.7× 340 2.6× 92 1.2× 171 2.4× 53 700
Lucía Antolín Suárez Spain 13 255 1.0× 153 0.7× 250 1.9× 112 1.5× 109 1.6× 35 533
Marie-Hélène Véronneau United States 8 262 1.1× 206 0.9× 162 1.2× 75 1.0× 97 1.4× 9 507

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Dunlap

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Dunlap's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Dunlap with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Dunlap more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Dunlap

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Dunlap. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Dunlap. The network helps show where Sarah Dunlap may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Dunlap

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Dunlap. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Dunlap based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Dunlap. Sarah Dunlap is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Ford, Cassandra D., et al.. (2024). Exploring the cardiovascular health behaviors of college students and the areas that need increased public health efforts. Public Health Nursing. 41(6). 1331–1341.
3.
Barth, Joan M., et al.. (2021). Variability in STEM Summer Bridge Programs: Associations with Belonging and STEM Self-Efficacy. Frontiers in Education. 6. 5 indexed citations
4.
Dunlap, Sarah & Joan M. Barth. (2019). Career Stereotypes and Identities: Implicit Beliefs and Major Choice for College Women and Men in STEM and Female-Dominated Fields. Sex Roles. 81(9-10). 548–560. 27 indexed citations
5.
Dunlap, Sarah, et al.. (2018). Gender Roles in the Romantic Relationships of Women in STEM and Female-Dominated Majors: A Study of Heterosexual Couples. Gender Issues. 36(2). 113–135. 7 indexed citations
6.
Barth, Joan M., et al.. (2016). The Influence of Romantic Partners on Women in STEM Majors. Sex Roles. 75(3-4). 110–125. 21 indexed citations
7.
Burkett, S. L., Sushma Kotru, John C. Lusth, Debra Moehle McCallum, & Sarah Dunlap. (2014). Introducing Creativity In A Design Laboratory For A Freshman Level Electrical And Computer Engineering Course. 5(1). 11–26. 7 indexed citations
8.
Lusth, John C., et al.. (2014). A kit-based approach to preparing undergraduate students for research. 1 indexed citations
9.
Barry, Tammy D., Sarah Dunlap, John E. Lochman, & Karen C. Wells. (2009). Inconsistent Discipline as a Mediator Between Maternal Distress and Aggression in Boys. Child & Family Behavior Therapy. 31(1). 1–19. 58 indexed citations
10.
Barry, Tammy D., et al.. (2005). The Influence of Maternal Stress and Distress on Disruptive Behavior Problems in Boys. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 44(3). 265–273. 125 indexed citations
11.
Barth, Joan M., et al.. (2004). Classroom environment influences on aggression, peer relations, and academic focus. Journal of School Psychology. 42(2). 115–133. 206 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026