Sara R. Cooper
- Education top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Plant Science
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Nathan R. KuncelShonna D. WatersPaul R. SackettEva M. ShippSharon P. CooperRyan WhitworthNancy F. WellerDeborah J. del Junco
- Topics
- Agriculture and Farm Safety (3 papers)Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (2 papers)Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilCanada
In The Last Decade
Sara R. Cooper
14 papers receiving 316 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Education 131
- Sociology and Political Science 61
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 53
- Plant Science 48
- Clinical Psychology 45
Countries citing papers authored by Sara R. Cooper
This map shows the geographic impact of Sara R. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara R. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara R. Cooper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sara R. Cooper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara R. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara R. Cooper. The network helps show where Sara R. Cooper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara R. Cooper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara R. Cooper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara R. Cooper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara R. Cooper. Sara R. Cooper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Socioeconomic Status and the Relationship between the SAT® and Freshman GPA: An Analysis of Data from 41 Colleges and Universities. Research Report No. 2009-1. | 5 |
| 5 | 168 | |
| 6 | Socioeconomic Status and the Relationship Between the SAT and Freshman GPA: An Analysis of Data from 41 Colleges and Universities | 10 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 51 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | Comparative description of migrant farmworkers versus other students attending South Texas schools: demographic, academic, and health characteristics. | 10 |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 52 | |
| 14 | Drowning and near drowning in children. | 4 |
About Sara R. Cooper
Sara R. Cooper is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Education, having authored 14 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agriculture and Farm Safety (3 papers), Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (2 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (30 citations), Education (131 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (53 citations). Sara R. Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Nathan R. Kuncel, Shonna D. Waters, Paul R. Sackett, Eva M. Shipp, Sharon P. Cooper, Ryan Whitworth, Nancy F. Weller, Deborah J. del Junco, Erin E. Fox and Craig L. Hanis. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Annals of Epidemiology and Lung Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.