Sandra Virtue

565 total citations
21 papers, 378 citations indexed

About

Sandra Virtue is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Sandra Virtue has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 378 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 10 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Sandra Virtue's work include Reading and Literacy Development (13 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (8 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (7 papers). Sandra Virtue is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (13 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (8 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (7 papers). Sandra Virtue collaborates with scholars based in United States. Sandra Virtue's co-authors include Paul van den Broek, Mark Beeman, Todd B. Parrish, Tracy Linderholm, Jason Haberman, Yuhtsuen Tzeng, Christopher A. Kurby, Chad J. Marsolek, Michelle Everson and Leonard A. Jason and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain Research, Neuropsychologia and Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Sandra Virtue

20 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sandra Virtue United States 9 224 190 125 63 37 21 378
Soyoung Suh United States 4 118 0.5× 233 1.2× 125 1.0× 40 0.6× 38 1.0× 12 356
Francesca Panzeri Italy 9 122 0.5× 125 0.7× 69 0.6× 34 0.5× 47 1.3× 29 267
Laura M. Morett United States 11 131 0.6× 223 1.2× 163 1.3× 38 0.6× 61 1.6× 34 326
R. Brooke Lea United States 12 148 0.7× 212 1.1× 135 1.1× 26 0.4× 33 0.9× 16 367
April Fugett United States 6 191 0.9× 178 0.9× 109 0.9× 91 1.4× 16 0.4× 10 364
Yen Na Yum Hong Kong 11 192 0.9× 169 0.9× 66 0.5× 42 0.7× 13 0.4× 25 309
Nick Braisby United Kingdom 7 59 0.3× 124 0.7× 132 1.1× 64 1.0× 26 0.7× 14 277
Deanna C. Friesen Canada 13 332 1.5× 304 1.6× 86 0.7× 27 0.4× 41 1.1× 30 478
Meredith M. Hughes United States 4 141 0.6× 140 0.7× 102 0.8× 20 0.3× 85 2.3× 5 277
Peggy Joy Goetz United States 4 116 0.5× 258 1.4× 76 0.6× 45 0.7× 80 2.2× 6 348

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Virtue

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Virtue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Virtue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Virtue more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Virtue

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Virtue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Virtue. The network helps show where Sandra Virtue may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandra Virtue

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandra Virtue. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandra Virtue based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sandra Virtue. Sandra Virtue is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Virtue, Sandra, et al.. (2018). Hemispheric processing in conventional metaphor comprehension: The role of general knowledge. Neuropsychologia. 114. 101–109. 8 indexed citations
2.
Virtue, Sandra, et al.. (2016). Hemispheric processing of predictive inferences: the influence of reading goals and textual constraint. Cognitive Neuroscience. 8(1). 50–58. 6 indexed citations
3.
Virtue, Sandra, et al.. (2016). What Can Neuroimaging Research Tell Us About Inference Generation during Text Comprehension?. Language and Linguistics Compass. 10(6). 257–271. 2 indexed citations
4.
5.
Virtue, Sandra, et al.. (2012). Processing Causality in Narrative Events: Temporal Order Matters. Discourse Processes. 49(1). 61–77. 24 indexed citations
6.
Virtue, Sandra, et al.. (2011). Hemispheric processing of sarcastic text. Journal of Neurolinguistics. 24(4). 466–475. 6 indexed citations
7.
Virtue, Sandra, et al.. (2011). Hemispheric processing of inferences during text comprehension: The role of consistency and task difficulty. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition. 17(5). 549–564. 5 indexed citations
8.
Virtue, Sandra, et al.. (2011). Metaphoric advertisement comprehension: The role of the cerebral hemispheres. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 10(1). 41–50. 11 indexed citations
9.
Virtue, Sandra, et al.. (2011). Running Head: Hemispheric Processing of Slogans Brand Familiarity in Advertisement Slogans: The Role of the Left and Right Cerebral Hemispheres. International Journal of Marketing Studies. 3(3). 3 indexed citations
10.
Virtue, Sandra, et al.. (2010). Hemispheric differences for enhancement and suppression mechanisms during story comprehension. Cognitive Neuroscience. 1(2). 89–95. 2 indexed citations
11.
Aase, Darrin M., Leonard A. Jason, Bradley D. Olson, et al.. (2009). A Longitudinal Analysis of Criminal and Aggressive Behaviors Among a National Sample of Adults in Mutual-Help Recovery Homes. Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery. 4(1-2). 82–91. 8 indexed citations
12.
Virtue, Sandra, et al.. (2009). Hemispheric processing in bilinguals: The role of shared meanings across languages and sentential constraint. Cognitive Neuroscience. 1(1). 26–32.
13.
Virtue, Sandra, et al.. (2008). Hemispheric processing of semantic information: The effects of the semantic priming task and working memory capacity. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition. 14(4). 345–361. 2 indexed citations
14.
Virtue, Sandra, Todd B. Parrish, & Mark Beeman. (2008). Inferences during Story Comprehension: Cortical Recruitment Affected by Predictability of Events and Working Memory Capacity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 20(12). 2274–2284. 43 indexed citations
15.
Virtue, Sandra, Paul van den Broek, & Tracy Linderholm. (2006). Hemispheric processing of inferences: The effects of textual constraint and working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition. 34(6). 1341–1354. 40 indexed citations
16.
Virtue, Sandra, et al.. (2006). Neural activity of inferences during story comprehension. Brain Research. 1084(1). 104–114. 107 indexed citations
17.
Virtue, Sandra, et al.. (2005). Evidence for dissociable neural mechanisms underlying inference generation in familiar and less-familiar scenarios. Brain and Language. 95(3). 402–413. 18 indexed citations
18.
Virtue, Sandra & Paul van den Broek. (2004). Hemispheric processing of anaphoric inferences: The activation of multiple antecedents. Brain and Language. 93(3). 327–337. 13 indexed citations
19.
Linderholm, Tracy, Sandra Virtue, Yuhtsuen Tzeng, & Paul van den Broek. (2004). Fluctuations in the Availability of Information During Reading: Capturing Cognitive Processes Using the Landscape Model. Discourse Processes. 37(2). 165–186. 61 indexed citations
20.
Broek, Paul van den, et al.. (2002). 6. Comprehension and memory of science texts: inferential processes and the construction of a mental representantion. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 131–154. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026