Nick Braisby
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Debi RobersonJulie DockrellJules DavidoffJames A. HamptonBradley FranksRachel BestPatrick BlackburnLawrence Cavedon
- Topics
- Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers)Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers)Categorization, perception, and language (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyDevelopmental and Educational PsychologySocial Psychology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nick Braisby
12 papers receiving 260 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 132
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 124
- Social Psychology 64
- Cognitive Neuroscience 59
- Artificial Intelligence 26
Countries citing papers authored by Nick Braisby
This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Braisby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Braisby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Braisby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Braisby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Braisby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Braisby. The network helps show where Nick Braisby may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nick Braisby
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nick Braisby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nick Braisby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nick Braisby. Nick Braisby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cognitive psychology, 2nd ed. | 2 |
| 2 | Categorisation of Sexual Orientation: a Test of Essentialism | 0 |
| 3 | 32 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | Cognitive psychology : a methods companion | 3 |
| 7 | Logic, Language and Computation, Volume 3 | 6 |
| 8 | 101 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 65 | |
| 14 | 10 |
About Nick Braisby
Nick Braisby is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers) and Categorization, perception, and language (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (132 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (124 citations) and Social Psychology (64 citations). Nick Braisby has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Debi Roberson, Julie Dockrell, Jules Davidoff, James A. Hampton, Bradley Franks, Rachel Best, Patrick Blackburn, Lawrence Cavedon, Atsushi Shimojima and Angus Gellatly. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Cognition and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.