Sandra F. Naoom

8 papers receiving 934 citations

Hit Papers

Core Implementation Components20092026201420202009250500750

Peers

Sandra F. Naoom
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • General Health Professions 543
  • Clinical Psychology 345
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 172
  • Education 157
  • Management Science and Operations Research 105
Replace Mark C. Holter with:
Mark C. Holter United States
Frances Wallace United States
Brian K. Bumbarger United States
Danielle R. Adams United States
Patrick H. DeLeon United States
Danielle L. Fettes United States
James Martínez United States
CATHERINE L. GRUS United States
Rosemary D. Meza United States
Laura Dietzen United States
Sandra F. Naoom relative to Mark C. Holter United States Mark C. Holter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Mark C. Holter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra F. Naoom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra F. Naoom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra F. Naoom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra F. Naoom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra F. Naoom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra F. Naoom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra F. Naoom. The network helps show where Sandra F. Naoom may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandra F. Naoom

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandra F. Naoom. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandra F. Naoom based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sandra F. Naoom. Sandra F. Naoom is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 23
2 6
3 58
4 58
5
Implementation of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents: Research findings and their implications for the future.
57
6
Core Implementation Componentsbreakdown →
770
7
Implementing the Findings of Research: Bridging the Gap between Knowledge and Practice.
21
8
Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the
6

About Sandra F. Naoom

Sandra F. Naoom is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 8 papers that have together received 999 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), Community Health and Development (3 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (543 citations), Clinical Psychology (345 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (172 citations). Sandra F. Naoom has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Dean L. Fixsen, Karen A. Blasé, Frances Wallace, Vicky Scott, Michelle A. Duda, Melissa Van Dyke, Allison Metz, Dawn K. Wilson, Leah Bartley and Jeffrey E. Hall. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Safety Research, Research on Social Work Practice and Journal of Public Health Management and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026