Sandra Ackermann

26 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Sandra Ackermann
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 70
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 240
  • Neurology 273
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 338
  • Cancer Research 214
Replace X. Lin with:
X. Lin United States
Hooman Ganjavi Canada
Valeria Latorre Italy
Yingxue Gao China
Herta H. Chao United States
Lan Xiong Canada
Thomas W. Mühleisen Germany
Ayako Inoue Japan
Stefanie Schulte Germany
Sandra Ackermann relative to X. Lin United States X. Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
X. Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Ackermann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Ackermann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Ackermann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Ackermann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Ackermann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Ackermann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Ackermann. The network helps show where Sandra Ackermann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandra Ackermann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandra Ackermann Line = papers co-authored together Sandra Ackermann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014166
2 2013159
3 201573
4 201172
5 202171
6 201058
7 201956
8 201338
9 201534
10 201232
11 201531
12 201531
13 201631
14 201129
15 201424
16 201924
17 201222
18 201320
19 201219
20 201413

About Sandra Ackermann

Sandra Ackermann is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (9 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (5 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (4 papers), Sleep and related disorders (4 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (3 papers) and Signaling Pathways in Disease (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (70 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (240 citations), Neurology (273 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (338 citations) and Cancer Research (214 citations). Sandra Ackermann has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Björn Rasch, Matthias Fischer, Andreas Papassotiropoulos, Dominique J.‐F. de Quervain, Barbara Hero, Frank Berthold, Yvonne Kahlert, Maren Jasmin Cordi, Francina Hartmann and Volker Ehemann. Their work appears in journals such as Psychoneuroendocrinology, Swiss Medical Weekly, Clinical Cancer Research, Scientific Reports and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact