Leo Gschwind
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Dominique J.‐F. de QuervainAndreas PapassotiropoulosKlara SpalekChristian VoglerAnnette MilnikMatthias FastenrathDavid CoynelKlaus Opwis
- Topics
- Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers)Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNature CommunicationsJournal of Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Leo Gschwind
21 papers receiving 776 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Cognitive Neuroscience 233
- Molecular Biology 151
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 131
- Behavioral Neuroscience 106
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 90
Countries citing papers authored by Leo Gschwind
This map shows the geographic impact of Leo Gschwind's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo Gschwind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo Gschwind more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leo Gschwind
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo Gschwind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo Gschwind. The network helps show where Leo Gschwind may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leo Gschwind
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leo Gschwind. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leo Gschwind based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leo Gschwind. Leo Gschwind is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 97 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 34 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 51 | |
| 11 | 139 | |
| 12 | 76 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 46 | |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 110 |
About Leo Gschwind
Leo Gschwind is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Aging and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 21 papers that have together received 792 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (106 citations), Aging (31 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (54 citations). Leo Gschwind has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dominique J.‐F. de Quervain, Andreas Papassotiropoulos, Klara Spalek, Christian Vogler, Annette Milnik, Matthias Fastenrath, David Coynel, Klaus Opwis, Markus Stöcklin and Annamarie Vogt. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.