Psychoneuroendocrinology

6.6k papers and 302.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.6k papers published in Psychoneuroendocrinology in the last decades have received a total of 302.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychoneuroendocrinology usually cover Behavioral Neuroscience (3.5k papers), Social Psychology (1.9k papers) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Stress Responses and Cortisol (3.5k papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (1.7k papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (906 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychoneuroendocrinology are Dirk H. Hellhammer, Clemens Kirschbaum, Jan Pieter Konsman, Nicolas Rohleder, Brigitte M. Kudielka, Ulrike Ehlert, Emma K. Adam, Jens C. Pruessner, Urs M. Nater and Stefan Wüst.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychoneuroendocrinology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychoneuroendocrinology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychoneuroendocrinology.

Countries where authors publish in Psychoneuroendocrinology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychoneuroendocrinology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychoneuroendocrinology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychoneuroendocrinology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025