Ruth Thomas

30 papers receiving 569 citations

Peers

Ruth Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Infectious Diseases 115
  • General Health Professions 109
  • Genetics 120
  • Education 120
  • Epidemiology 131
Replace Anna Pérez with:
Anna Pérez Spain
Alfonso Osorio Spain
Mary T. Hoban United States
Stefan Ecks United Kingdom
Khalid Mahmood Pakistan
Thomas May United States
Poonam Sharma India
Gilles Bibeau Canada
Deborah Johnson United States
Awoyemi A. Awofala Nigeria
Ruth Thomas relative to Anna Pérez Spain Anna Pérez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Anna Pérez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Thomas. The network helps show where Ruth Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000133
2
Assessing Technology Integration: The RAT – Replacement, Amplification, and Transformation - Framework
200686
3 202060
4 202134
5 200331
6 200427
7 199026
8
Technology Education and the Cognitive Revolution.
199224
9 199023
10 202321
11 200321
12 202121
13 201918
14 199616
15 201413
16 196612
17
Teaching for Transfer of Learning.
199211
18 202210
19 20118
20
Internet Integration in High Schools: Patterns, Opportunities, and Barriers.
20026

About Ruth Thomas

Ruth Thomas is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science, Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 629 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (6 papers), Sex work and related issues (5 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Children's Rights and Participation (3 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers) and Parental Involvement in Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (115 citations), General Health Professions (109 citations), Genetics (120 citations), Education (120 citations) and Epidemiology (131 citations). Ruth Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Cassandra Scharber, Joan E. Hughes, Moira Plant, K. Klinger, Nicholas Coleman, Lukas Foggensteiner, Catherine A. Boulter, Oxana Ibraghimov‐Beskrovnaya, Richard Sandford and A. Paul Bevan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the International AIDS Society, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child and British Journal of Music Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact