John R. Bradley
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Immunology top 1%
- Surgery top 2%
- Genetics top 2%
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Co-authors
- Jordan S. PoberS ThiruRafia S. Al‐LamkiJ.P. WatersMin WangDavid R. JohnsonElizabeth C. LedgerwoodJ. Andrew Bradley
- Topics
- Immune Response and Inflammation (11 papers)Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (10 papers)Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
John R. Bradley
147 papers receiving 7.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
- Molecular Biology 3.0k
- Immunology 2.2k
- Surgery 1.2k
- Genetics 985
- Cancer Research 915
Countries citing papers authored by John R. Bradley
This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Bradley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Bradley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Bradley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Bradley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Bradley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Bradley. The network helps show where John R. Bradley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John R. Bradley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John R. Bradley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John R. Bradley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John R. Bradley. John R. Bradley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Spontaneous, persistent, T cell–dependent IFN-γ release in patients who progress to Long Covidbreakdown → | 41 |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 112 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | Saudi Arabia's Invisible Hand in the Arab Spring | 2 |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 89 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 68 | |
| 15 | Roundtable - In Cobol's Defense. | 11 |
| 16 | 133 | |
| 17 | 87 | |
| 18 | 104 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About John R. Bradley
John R. Bradley is a scholar working on Transplantation, Nephrology and General Psychology, having authored 151 papers that have together received 8.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Immune Response and Inflammation (11 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (10 papers) and Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (561 citations), Immunology (2.2k citations) and Cancer Research (915 citations). John R. Bradley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jordan S. Pober, S Thiru, Rafia S. Al‐Lamki, J.P. Waters, Rafia S. Al‐Lamki, Min Wang, David R. Johnson, Elizabeth C. Ledgerwood, J. Andrew Bradley and Kenneth G. C. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Lancet and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.