Countries where authors publish in Journal of the International AIDS Society
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of the International AIDS Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of the International AIDS Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of the International AIDS Society more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of the International AIDS Society
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of the International AIDS Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of the International AIDS Society.
About Journal of the International AIDS Society
The 3.1k papers published in Journal of the International AIDS Society in the last decades have received a total of 59.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of the International AIDS Society usually cover Virology (917 papers), Infectious Diseases (2.6k papers) and Emergency Medicine (425 papers) specifically the topics of HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2.2k papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (1.0k papers) and HIV Research and Treatment (916 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of the International AIDS Society are Rachel Jewkes, Linda‐Gail Bekker, Nathan Ford, Stefan Baral, Robert Morrell, Anne Stangl, Rachel Baggaley, Carmen H. Logie, Kathleen Malee and Gitau Mburu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.