Ruth Simms‐Ellis
- Physiology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Rebecca LawtonMark ConnerChristopher J. ArmitageSarah GroganKamran SiddiqiLisa CowapCarole TorgersonRobert West
- Topics
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (10 papers)Smoking Behavior and Cessation (6 papers)Ethics in medical practice (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyAddiction
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaSingapore
In The Last Decade
Ruth Simms‐Ellis
24 papers receiving 374 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Physiology 171
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 150
- General Health Professions 124
- Clinical Psychology 83
- Applied Psychology 72
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Simms‐Ellis
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Simms‐Ellis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Simms‐Ellis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Simms‐Ellis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Simms‐Ellis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Simms‐Ellis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Simms‐Ellis. The network helps show where Ruth Simms‐Ellis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Simms‐Ellis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Simms‐Ellis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Simms‐Ellis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Simms‐Ellis. Ruth Simms‐Ellis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 53 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 125 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | National survey of counsellors working in primary care: evidence for growing professionalisation? | 24 |
About Ruth Simms‐Ellis
Ruth Simms‐Ellis is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Pharmacy and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 26 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (10 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (6 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (72 citations), Physiology (171 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (45 citations). Ruth Simms‐Ellis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Lawton, Mark Conner, Christopher J. Armitage, Sarah Grogan, Kamran Siddiqi, Lisa Cowap, Carole Torgerson, Robert West, David Meads and Bianca Sykes‐Muskett. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Addiction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.