Jane O’Hara

2.9k total citations
82 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Jane O’Hara is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services and Pharmacy. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane O’Hara has authored 82 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in General Health Professions, 27 papers in Emergency Medical Services and 26 papers in Pharmacy. Recurrent topics in Jane O’Hara's work include Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (26 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (24 papers) and Healthcare Quality and Management (13 papers). Jane O’Hara is often cited by papers focused on Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (26 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (24 papers) and Healthcare Quality and Management (13 papers). Jane O’Hara collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Jane O’Hara's co-authors include Rebecca Lawton, Laura Sheard, John Wright, Gerry Armitage, Caroline Reynolds, Rosemary McEachan, Mark Conner, Gemma Louch, Claire Marsh and Ian Watt and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Jane O’Hara

79 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane O’Hara United Kingdom 23 797 431 357 254 201 82 1.6k
Edris Kakemam Iran 20 595 0.7× 360 0.8× 213 0.6× 386 1.5× 109 0.5× 84 1.4k
Karina Aase Norway 25 934 1.2× 537 1.2× 172 0.5× 208 0.8× 337 1.7× 88 2.0k
Jason M. Etchegaray United States 21 385 0.5× 594 1.4× 420 1.2× 96 0.4× 173 0.9× 75 1.3k
Merrilyn Walton Australia 24 857 1.1× 624 1.4× 654 1.8× 169 0.7× 602 3.0× 83 2.0k
Liane Ginsburg Canada 25 675 0.8× 800 1.9× 560 1.6× 84 0.3× 206 1.0× 68 1.8k
Audrey Lyndon United States 31 687 0.9× 404 0.9× 175 0.5× 395 1.6× 579 2.9× 102 2.6k
V. Susan Dahinten Canada 27 794 1.0× 359 0.8× 196 0.5× 395 1.6× 275 1.4× 63 2.1k
Loredana Sasso Italy 29 1.0k 1.3× 374 0.9× 141 0.4× 425 1.7× 550 2.7× 154 2.7k
Dimitrios Zikos United States 10 1.4k 1.7× 364 0.8× 93 0.3× 188 0.7× 186 0.9× 60 2.0k
Sherry Espin Canada 23 765 1.0× 871 2.0× 383 1.1× 116 0.5× 490 2.4× 63 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane O’Hara

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane O’Hara's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane O’Hara with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane O’Hara more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane O’Hara

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane O’Hara. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane O’Hara. The network helps show where Jane O’Hara may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane O’Hara

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane O’Hara. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane O’Hara based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane O’Hara. Jane O’Hara is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ramsey, Lauren, Laura Sheard, Justin Waring, et al.. (2025). Humanizing processes after harm part 1: patient safety incident investigations, litigation and the experiences of those affected. Frontiers in Health Services. 4. 1473256–1473256. 6 indexed citations
2.
O’Hara, Jane, Lauren Ramsey, Siobhan McHugh, et al.. (2025). Co-designing and testing the learn together guidance to support patient and family involvement in patient safety investigations: a mixed-methods study. PubMed. 13(18). 1–125. 1 indexed citations
4.
Baker, John, Sarah Kendal, Chris Bojke, et al.. (2024). A service-user digital intervention to collect real-time safety information on acute, adult mental health wards: the WardSonar mixed-methods study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(14). 1–182. 1 indexed citations
5.
Lawton, Rebecca, et al.. (2024). Do healthcare professionals work around safety standards, and should we be worried? A scoping review. BMJ Quality & Safety. 34(5). 317–329. 2 indexed citations
8.
Murray, Jenni, Ruth Baxter, Rebecca Lawton, et al.. (2023). Unpacking the Cinderella black box of complex intervention development through the Partners at Care Transitions (PACT) programme of research. Health Expectations. 26(4). 1478–1490. 9 indexed citations
9.
Ramsey, Lauren, et al.. (2023). Patient and public co‐creation of healthcare safety and healthcare system resilience: The case of COVID‐19. Health Expectations. 26(4). 1467–1477. 3 indexed citations
10.
Røislien, Jo, Jane O’Hara, Ionica Smeets, et al.. (2022). Creating Effective, Evidence-Based Video Communication of Public Health Science (COVCOM Study): Protocol for a Sequential Mixed Methods Effect Study. JMIR Research Protocols. 11(3). e34275–e34275. 9 indexed citations
11.
Aase, Ingunn, Eline Ree, Lene Schibevaag, et al.. (2021). Strategies and lessons learnt from user involvement in researching quality and safety in nursing homes and homecare. International Journal of Health Governance. 26(4). 384–396. 4 indexed citations
12.
Louch, Gemma, et al.. (2021). Exploring patient safety outcomes for people with learning disabilities in acute hospital settings: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 11(5). e047102–e047102. 19 indexed citations
13.
O’Hara, Jane, et al.. (2021). How do we educate medical students interprofessionally about patient safety? A scoping review. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 36(2). 259–267. 5 indexed citations
14.
McHugh, Siobhan, Rebecca Lawton, Jane O’Hara, & Laura Sheard. (2020). Does team reflexivity impact teamwork and communication in interprofessional hospital-based healthcare teams? A systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMJ Quality & Safety. 29(8). 672–683. 50 indexed citations
15.
Wiig, Siri, Alan Boyd, Kate Churruca, et al.. (2020). What methods are used to promote patient and family involvement in healthcare regulation? A multiple case study across four countries. BMC Health Services Research. 20(1). 616–616. 15 indexed citations
16.
Baxter, Ruth, Jane O’Hara, Jenni Murray, et al.. (2018). Partners at Care Transitions: exploring healthcare professionals’ perspectives of excellence at care transitions for older people. BMJ Open. 8(9). e022468–e022468. 11 indexed citations
17.
Johnson, Judith, Gemma Louch, Alice Dunning, et al.. (2017). Burnout mediates the association between depression and patient safety perceptions: a cross‐sectional study in hospital nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 73(7). 1667–1680. 66 indexed citations
18.
Sheard, Laura, Claire Marsh, Jane O’Hara, et al.. (2017). Exploring how ward staff engage with the implementation of a patient safety intervention: a UK-based qualitative process evaluation. BMJ Open. 7(7). e014558–e014558. 24 indexed citations
19.
Louch, Gemma, Jane O’Hara, Peter Gardner, & Daryl B. O’Connor. (2017). A Daily Diary Approach to the Examination of Chronic Stress, Daily Hassles and Safety Perceptions in Hospital Nursing. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 24(6). 946–956. 15 indexed citations
20.
Conner, Mark, Rosemary McEachan, Natalie Taylor, Jane O’Hara, & Rebecca Lawton. (2014). Role of affective attitudes and anticipated affective reactions in predicting health behaviors.. Health Psychology. 34(6). 642–652. 131 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026