David Meads

5.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
151 papers, 3.7k citations indexed

About

David Meads is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, David Meads has authored 151 papers receiving a total of 3.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 46 papers in General Health Professions and 24 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in David Meads's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (41 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (11 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (11 papers). David Meads is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (41 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (11 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (11 papers). David Meads collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and United States. David Meads's co-authors include Stephen P. McKenna, Lynda Doward, Judy Wright, John O’Dwyer, Natalie Doughty, Claire Hulme, José M Valderas, Sonia Dalkin, Joanne Greenhalgh and Nick Black and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

David Meads

144 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories sort by overperformance

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Effect of tight control of inflammation in early psoriatic arthritis (TICOPA): a UK multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

2015 329 citations Laura C. Coates, Anna R. Moverley et al. profile →

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
David Meads	765	685	544	540	473	151	3.7k
Christie M. Bartels	712 0.9×	308 0.4×	297 0.5×	369 0.7×	874 1.8×	111	3.3k
Stephen P. McKenna	760 1.0×	773 1.1×	818 1.5×	341 0.6×	1.2k 2.6×	154	6.0k
Kirstie Haywood	928 1.2×	473 0.7×	242 0.4×	547 1.0×	758 1.6×	109	5.2k
Paola Mosconi	842 1.1×	510 0.7×	648 1.2×	855 1.6×	258 0.5×	138	6.1k
Rozana Mesquita Ciconelli	726 0.9×	292 0.4×	307 0.6×	359 0.7×	546 1.2×	100	4.3k
Laurie B. Burke	655 0.9×	850 1.2×	380 0.7×	660 1.2×	338 0.7×	60	5.9k
S. P. McKenna	629 0.8×	628 0.9×	256 0.5×	298 0.6×	611 1.3×	29	4.1k
Heiner Raspe	623 0.8×	326 0.5×	573 1.1×	380 0.7×	526 1.1×	208	4.0k
Wilbert B. van den Hout	585 0.8×	755 1.1×	617 1.1×	359 0.7×	477 1.0×	173	5.3k
Berit Rokne Hanestad	906 1.2×	227 0.3×	416 0.8×	677 1.3×	213 0.5×	119	4.8k

Countries citing papers authored by David Meads

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Meads's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Meads with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Meads more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Meads

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Meads. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Meads. The network helps show where David Meads may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Meads

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Meads. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Meads based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Meads. David Meads is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

O’Dwyer, John, Louise Bryant, Claire Hulme, Paul Kind, & David Meads. (2024). Adapting the EQ-5D-3L for adults with mild to moderate learning disabilities. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 22(1). 37–37. 2 indexed citations

Webb, Edward, David Meads, Helen Ford, et al.. (2023). Decision Making About Disease-Modifying Treatments for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Stated Preferences and Real-World Choices. Patient. 16(5). 457–471. 2 indexed citations

Webb, Edward, David Meads, & Clare Gardiner. (2023). The informal carer experience during the COVID-19 pandemic: mental health, loneliness, and financial (in)-security. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 2. 3 indexed citations

Webb, Edward, David Meads, Simon Judge, et al.. (2023). Something for everybody? Assessing the suitability of AAC systems for children using stated preference methods. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 39(3). 157–169.

Latter, Sue, Jacqueline Birtwistle, Alison Richardson, et al.. (2022). Patient and carer access to medicines at end of life: the ActMed mixed-methods study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10(20). 1–208. 4 indexed citations

Webb, Edward, Paul Kind, David Meads, & Adam Martin. (2021). Does a health crisis change how we value health?. Health Economics. 30(10). 2547–2560. 17 indexed citations

Candio, Paolo, David Meads, Andrew J. Hill, & Laura Bojke. (2021). Taking a local government perspective for economic evaluation of a population-level programme to promote exercise. Health Policy. 125(5). 651–657. 4 indexed citations

Young, John, John R. Green, Mary Godfrey, et al.. (2021). The Prevention of Delirium system of care for older patients admitted to hospital for emergency care: the POD research programme including feasibility RCT. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(4). 1–180. 3 indexed citations

Candio, Paolo, Koen B. Pouwels, David Meads, et al.. (2021). Modelling decay in effectiveness for evaluation of behaviour change interventions: a tutorial for public health economists. The European Journal of Health Economics. 23(7). 1151–1157. 4 indexed citations

10.

Webb, Edward, David Meads, Helen Ford, et al.. (2020). The Impact of Reproductive Issues on Preferences of Women with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis for Disease-Modifying Treatments. Patient. 13(5). 583–597. 7 indexed citations

11.

Manzano, Ana, Helen Ford, Hilary Bekker, et al.. (2020). Impact of communication on first treatment decisions in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Patient Education and Counseling. 103(12). 2540–2547. 11 indexed citations

12.

Webb, Edward, John O’Dwyer, David Meads, Paul Kind, & Penny Wright. (2020). Transforming discrete choice experiment latent scale values for EQ-5D-3L using the visual analogue scale. The European Journal of Health Economics. 21(5). 787–800. 17 indexed citations

13.

Murray, Janice, Juliet Goldbart, Simon Judge, et al.. (2020). The decision-making process in recommending electronic communication aids for children and young people who are non-speaking: the I-ASC mixed-methods study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8(45). 1–158. 11 indexed citations

14.

Manzano, Ana, Helen Ford, Sue Pavitt, et al.. (2020). Patient perspective on decisions to switch disease-modifying treatments in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 46. 102507–102507. 13 indexed citations

15.

Candio, Paolo, David Meads, Andrew J. Hill, & Laura Bojke. (2020). Cost-effectiveness of a proportionate universal offer of free exercise: Leeds Let’s Get Active. Journal of Public Health. 43(4). 876–886. 4 indexed citations

16.

Conner, Mark, Sarah Grogan, Robert West, et al.. (2019). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of repeated implementation intention formation on adolescent smoking initiation: A cluster randomized controlled trial.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 87(5). 422–432. 17 indexed citations

17.

Webb, Edward, David Meads, Simon Judge, et al.. (2019). Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open. 9(11). e030274–e030274. 17 indexed citations

18.

Webb, Edward, David Meads, Simon Judge, et al.. (2019). What’s important in AAC decision making for children? Evidence from a best–worst scaling survey. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 35(2). 80–94. 20 indexed citations

19.

Barber, Sophy, Hilary Bekker, David Meads, Sue Pavitt, & Balvinder Khambay. (2018). Identification and appraisal of outcome measures used to evaluate hypodontia care: A systematic review. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 153(2). 184–194.e18. 14 indexed citations

20.

O’Dwyer, John, David Meads, Claire Hulme, et al.. (2017). Cost‐Effectiveness of Tight Control of Inflammation in Early Psoriatic Arthritis: Economic Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthritis Care & Research. 70(3). 462–468. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact