Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner

873 total citations
28 papers, 631 citations indexed

About

Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 631 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Health, 18 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 9 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner's work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (20 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (7 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (5 papers). Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner is often cited by papers focused on Intimate Partner and Family Violence (20 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (7 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (5 papers). Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner collaborates with scholars based in United States. Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner's co-authors include Cris M. Sullivan, Deborah Bybee, Susan L. Miller, Heather C. Melton, Joanne Belknap, William S. Davidson, Linda A. Jackson, Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner, Deeanna M. Button and Justin T. Denney and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Public Health, Sex Roles and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

In The Last Decade

Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner

25 papers receiving 580 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner United States 12 478 406 220 182 122 28 631
Shamita Das Dasgupta Ecuador 9 442 0.9× 454 1.1× 259 1.2× 204 1.1× 140 1.1× 16 713
Deborah Epstein United States 12 302 0.6× 282 0.7× 199 0.9× 140 0.8× 121 1.0× 25 559
Consuelo Corradi Italy 12 289 0.6× 323 0.8× 196 0.9× 106 0.6× 67 0.5× 29 540
Raquel Kennedy Bergen United States 12 394 0.8× 376 0.9× 386 1.8× 182 1.0× 85 0.7× 19 660
Jude Towers United Kingdom 9 365 0.8× 351 0.9× 224 1.0× 152 0.8× 109 0.9× 18 573
Linda P. Rouse United States 10 339 0.7× 265 0.7× 190 0.9× 134 0.7× 138 1.1× 20 512
Kate Fitz‐Gibbon Australia 17 427 0.9× 483 1.2× 184 0.8× 236 1.3× 120 1.0× 96 749
Dianne Cyr Carmody United States 12 246 0.5× 301 0.7× 285 1.3× 189 1.0× 40 0.3× 18 574
Robert T. Sigler United States 14 306 0.6× 434 1.1× 154 0.7× 177 1.0× 157 1.3× 50 640
Sónia Caridade Portugal 10 346 0.7× 255 0.6× 167 0.8× 248 1.4× 104 0.9× 74 546

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner. The network helps show where Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner. Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fleury‐Steiner, Ruth E., et al.. (2025). “He Just Wants to Get Under My Skin”: Systemic Barriers That Mother-Survivors Confront While Prioritizing Protection. Violence Against Women. 32(5). 1104–1125.
2.
Horney, Jennifer A., et al.. (2024). Disruption, adaptation, and maintenance of domestic violence services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Critical Public Health. 34(1). 1–10.
3.
4.
Fleury‐Steiner, Ruth E., et al.. (2023). When Calling the Police Exacerbates Harm: Exploring the Roles of Intimate Partner Victimization and Women’s Use of Force. Journal of Family Violence. 40(2). 329–339. 1 indexed citations
5.
Fleury‐Steiner, Ruth E., et al.. (2023). Impacts of the COVID-19 Response on the Domestic Violence Workforce. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 39(5-6). 1190–1205. 3 indexed citations
6.
Fleury‐Steiner, Ruth E., et al.. (2022). Online Guidance for Domestic Violence Survivors and Service Providers: A COVID-19 Content Analysis. Violence Against Women. 29(3-4). 671–685. 1 indexed citations
7.
Miller, Susan L., et al.. (2021). Legal Consciousness and Intimate Partner Violence Survivors’ Perceptions of Protection Order Violations. Journal of Family Violence. 37(8). 1379–1390. 2 indexed citations
8.
Fleury‐Steiner, Ruth E., et al.. (2019). Hate the Players, or the Game? The Role of Court Mediators and Hearing Officers in the Civil Protection Order Process. Violence and Victims. 34(4). 592–612. 4 indexed citations
9.
Fleury‐Steiner, Ruth E. & Susan L. Miller. (2019). Reproductive Coercion and Perceptions of Future Violence. Violence Against Women. 26(10). 1228–1241. 7 indexed citations
10.
Fleury‐Steiner, Ruth E., et al.. (2018). Mediating Justice: Women’s Perceptions of Fairness in the Civil Protection Order Process. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 36(7-8). 3331–3352. 9 indexed citations
11.
Fleury‐Steiner, Ruth E., et al.. (2016). Calling the Shots: How Family Courts Address the Firearms Ban in Protection Orders. Violence Against Women. 23(9). 1140–1151. 11 indexed citations
12.
Fleury‐Steiner, Ruth E., et al.. (2014). “No Contact, Except . . .”. Feminist Criminology. 11(1). 3–22. 29 indexed citations
13.
Fleury‐Steiner, Ruth E., Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner, & Susan L. Miller. (2011). More Than a Piece of Paper? Protection Orders as a Resource for Battered Women. Sociology Compass. 5(7). 512–524. 9 indexed citations
14.
Button, Deeanna M., et al.. (2010). The Internet as a Tool for Black Feminist Activism: Lessons From an Online Antirape Protest. Feminist Criminology. 5(3). 244–262. 27 indexed citations
15.
Belknap, Joanne, Heather C. Melton, Justin T. Denney, Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner, & Cris M. Sullivan. (2009). The Levels and Roles of Social and Institutional Support Reported by Survivors of Intimate Partner Abuse. Feminist Criminology. 4(4). 377–402. 34 indexed citations
16.
Fleury‐Steiner, Ruth E. & Susan L. Miller. (2008). Research, Dissemination, and Activism. Feminist Criminology. 3(4). 243–246. 1 indexed citations
17.
Fleury‐Steiner, Ruth E.. (2002). Missing Voices. Violence Against Women. 8(2). 181–205. 45 indexed citations
18.
Jackson, Linda A., et al.. (2001). Effects of Affect, Stereotype Consistency, and Valence of Behavior on Causal Attributions. The Journal of Social Psychology. 141(1). 31–48. 15 indexed citations
19.
Fleury‐Steiner, Ruth E., Cris M. Sullivan, Deborah Bybee, & William S. Davidson. (1998). What happened depends on whom you ask: A comparison of police records and victim reports regarding arrests for woman battering. Journal of Criminal Justice. 26(1). 53–59. 7 indexed citations
20.
Jackson, Linda A., et al.. (1996). Feminism: Definitions, support, and correlates of support among female and male college students. Sex Roles. 34-34(9-10). 687–693. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shamita Das Dasgupta Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Deborah Epstein Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Consuelo Corradi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Raquel Kennedy Bergen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jude Towers Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Linda P. Rouse Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kate Fitz‐Gibbon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dianne Cyr Carmody Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert T. Sigler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sónia Caridade
Rankless by CCL
2026