Deeanna M. Button

25 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers

Deeanna M. Button
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Health 166
  • Gender Studies 155
  • Clinical Psychology 203
  • Social Psychology 197
  • Sociology and Political Science 252
Replace Heather Hensman Kettrey with:
Heather Hensman Kettrey United States
Shardé McNeil Smith United States
María Victoria Carrera Fernández Spain
Deborah Epstein United States
Megan K. Maas United States
Lisa K. Waldner United States
Bernie S. Newman United States
Eddie S. K. Chong Hong Kong
Deborah A. Gerrity United States
Delida Sanchez United States
Deeanna M. Button relative to Heather Hensman Kettrey United States Heather Hensman Kettrey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Heather Hensman Kettrey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deeanna M. Button

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deeanna M. Button's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deeanna M. Button with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deeanna M. Button more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deeanna M. Button

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deeanna M. Button. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deeanna M. Button. The network helps show where Deeanna M. Button may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Deeanna M. Button, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deeanna M. Button Line = papers co-authored together Deeanna M. Button links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200997
2 201285
3 201663
4 201736
5 200827
6 201026
7 201626
8 201324
9 201723
10 200922
11 201522
12 201421
13 200814
14 201112
15 202112
16 200811
17 201810
18 20088
19 20087
20 20137

About Deeanna M. Button

Deeanna M. Button is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 26 papers that have together received 569 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (11 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (9 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (9 papers), Sex work and related issues (4 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (4 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers) and Health and Medical Research Impacts (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (166 citations), Gender Studies (155 citations), Clinical Psychology (203 citations), Social Psychology (197 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (252 citations). Deeanna M. Button has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. O’Connell, Brian K. Payne, Meredith G. F. Worthen, Kai Lin, Ivan Y. Sun, Matthew DeMichele, Ethan Czuy Levine, Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner, Yuning Wu and Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner. Their work appears in journals such as Feminist Criminology, Journal of Criminal Justice Education, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology and Sexuality Research and Social Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact