Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- General Health Professions
- Law top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Ruth E. Fleury‐SteinerDeeanna M. ButtonSusan L. MillerLaura Beth NielsenJudith TaylorKimberly D. RichmanElizabeth A. HoffmannCatherine R. Albiston
- Topics
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (11 papers)Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers)Law in Society and Culture (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner
24 papers receiving 192 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Sociology and Political Science 163
- Clinical Psychology 67
- General Health Professions 56
- Law 42
- Political Science and International Relations 29
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner. The network helps show where Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner. Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Knowing about the Atrocities of Mass Incarceration | 1 |
| 5 | 31 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | A Constitutive Perspective of Rights | 5 |
| 15 | Capital Jurors as the Litmus Test of Community Conscience for the Juvenile Death Penalty | 1 |
| 16 | Jurors' Stories of Death: How America's Death Penalty Invests in Inequality | 8 |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 29 |
About Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner
Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Law and Clinical Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 219 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (11 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (42 citations), Sociology and Political Science (163 citations) and Clinical Psychology (67 citations). Benjamin Fleury‐Steiner has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner, Deeanna M. Button, Susan L. Miller, Laura Beth Nielsen, Judith Taylor, Kimberly D. Richman, Elizabeth A. Hoffmann, Catherine R. Albiston, Alexander Testa and Valerie P. Hans. Their work appears in journals such as Law & Society Review, Theoretical Criminology and Criminology & Public Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.