Journal of Family Violence

2.2k papers and 57.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Journal of Family Violence in the last decades have received a total of 57.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Family Violence usually cover Health (1.7k papers), Clinical Psychology (1.3k papers) and Sociology and Political Science (943 papers) specifically the topics of Intimate Partner and Family Violence (1.7k papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (1.0k papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (452 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Family Violence are Jacqueline M. Golding, Linda L. Marshall, K. Daniel O’Leary, Edward W. Gondolf, Annette K. Griffith, Maura O’Keefe, Muhammad M. Haj‐Yahia, L. Kevin Hamberger, Michele Cascardi and Jan E. Stets.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Family Violence

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Family Violence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Family Violence.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Family Violence

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Family Violence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Family Violence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Family Violence more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025