Rodney Gabel

1.7k total citations
48 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Rodney Gabel is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rodney Gabel has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Clinical Psychology, 29 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 13 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Rodney Gabel's work include Stuttering Research and Treatment (42 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (27 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (12 papers). Rodney Gabel is often cited by papers focused on Stuttering Research and Treatment (42 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (27 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (12 papers). Rodney Gabel collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Rodney Gabel's co-authors include Derek E. Daniels, Stephanie Hughes, Glen M. Tellis, Gordon W. Blood, Farzan Irani, Ingrid M. Blood, Robin Alvares, Jeff Searl, Michael Boyle and Jacquelyn Y. Taylor and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Journal of Communication Disorders and Journal of Fluency Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Rodney Gabel

47 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rodney Gabel United States 21 1.1k 573 429 335 175 48 1.3k
Robert W. Quesal United States 17 1.4k 1.3× 821 1.4× 642 1.5× 604 1.8× 54 0.3× 31 1.5k
Lisa Iverach Australia 20 1.5k 1.3× 656 1.1× 537 1.3× 497 1.5× 29 0.2× 26 1.6k
Constance Dean Qualls United States 13 269 0.2× 170 0.3× 292 0.7× 130 0.4× 50 0.3× 17 588
Amy L. Weiss United States 14 435 0.4× 149 0.3× 777 1.8× 295 0.9× 75 0.4× 54 995
Anthony DiLollo United States 11 355 0.3× 143 0.2× 136 0.3× 152 0.5× 43 0.2× 25 485
Jane McCormack Australia 18 552 0.5× 171 0.3× 820 1.9× 193 0.6× 29 0.2× 43 1.2k
Patricia Prelock United States 25 797 0.7× 86 0.2× 950 2.2× 871 2.6× 33 0.2× 79 1.7k
Sarah Verdon Australia 15 273 0.2× 152 0.3× 434 1.0× 61 0.2× 96 0.5× 65 818
Jane Maxim United Kingdom 22 90 0.1× 318 0.6× 347 0.8× 681 2.0× 480 2.7× 42 1.1k
Rita L. Smith United States 8 368 0.3× 212 0.4× 190 0.4× 133 0.4× 25 0.1× 8 706

Countries citing papers authored by Rodney Gabel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rodney Gabel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rodney Gabel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rodney Gabel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rodney Gabel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rodney Gabel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rodney Gabel. The network helps show where Rodney Gabel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rodney Gabel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rodney Gabel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rodney Gabel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rodney Gabel. Rodney Gabel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gabel, Rodney, et al.. (2025). Relationship between familiarity with a person who stutters and vocational stereotyping. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 85. 106146–106146.
2.
Gabel, Rodney, et al.. (2024). How perceived communication skills needed for careers influences vocational stereotyping of people who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 80. 106039–106039. 6 indexed citations
3.
Byrd, Courtney T., et al.. (2023). Self-perceived outcomes of informative and apologetic self-disclosure: A mixed methods study. Journal of Communication Disorders. 106. 106387–106387. 3 indexed citations
5.
Gabel, Rodney, et al.. (2020). Vocational Stereotyping of People Who Stutter: Human Resource Management Students. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups. 5(5). 1139–1146. 9 indexed citations
6.
Boyle, Michael & Rodney Gabel. (2020). Toward a better understanding of the process of disclosure events among people who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 63. 105746–105746. 20 indexed citations
7.
Louis, Kenneth O. St., et al.. (2017). Evidence-based guidelines for being supportive of people who stutter in North America. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 53. 1–13. 21 indexed citations
8.
Gabel, Rodney, et al.. (2014). Discussing stuttering with parents: A preliminary study of the experiences of adolescents who stutter. Speech Language and Hearing. 18(1). 44–54. 8 indexed citations
9.
Irani, Farzan, Rodney Gabel, Derek E. Daniels, & Stephanie Hughes. (2012). The long term effectiveness of intensive stuttering therapy: A mixed methods study. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 37(3). 164–178. 46 indexed citations
10.
Daniels, Derek E., Rodney Gabel, & Stephanie Hughes. (2011). Recounting the K-12 school experiences of adults who stutter: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 37(2). 71–82. 82 indexed citations
11.
Grogan-Johnson, Sue, Rodney Gabel, Jacquelyn Y. Taylor, et al.. (2011). A Pilot Investigation of Speech Sound Disorder Intervention Delivered by Telehealth to School-Age Children. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 3(1). 31–42. 56 indexed citations
12.
Hughes, Stephanie, et al.. (2010). University students’ explanations for their descriptions of people who stutter: An exploratory mixed model study. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 35(3). 280–298. 51 indexed citations
13.
Hughes, Stephanie, et al.. (2009). University students’ perceptions of the life effects of stuttering. Journal of Communication Disorders. 43(1). 45–60. 36 indexed citations
14.
Healey, E. Charles, et al.. (2007). The effects of self-disclosure and non self-disclosure of stuttering on listeners’ perceptions of a person who stutters. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 32(1). 51–69. 62 indexed citations
15.
Gabel, Rodney, et al.. (2007). Listeners’ perceptions of the personality of male alaryngeal speakers. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology. 32(2). 53–59. 7 indexed citations
16.
Daniels, Derek E., Fran Hagstrom, & Rodney Gabel. (2006). A qualitative study of how African American men who stutter attribute meaning to identity and life choices. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 31(3). 200–215. 43 indexed citations
17.
Gabel, Rodney. (2006). Effects of stuttering severity and therapy involvement on attitudes towards people who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 31(3). 216–227. 52 indexed citations
18.
Gabel, Rodney, et al.. (2003). Measuring role entrapment of people who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 29(1). 27–49. 124 indexed citations
19.
Searl, Jeff & Rodney Gabel. (2003). Speech-Language Pathologists' Attitudes Toward Aging and the Elderly. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders. 30(Fall). 146–155. 4 indexed citations
20.
Searl, Jeff, et al.. (2002). Speech disfluency in centenarians. Journal of Communication Disorders. 35(5). 383–392. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026