Journal of Fluency Disorders

1.3k papers and 26.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Journal of Fluency Disorders in the last decades have received a total of 26.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Fluency Disorders usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.2k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (668 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (544 papers) specifically the topics of Stuttering Research and Treatment (1.2k papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (649 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (401 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Fluency Disorders are J. Scott Yaruss, Edward G. Conture, Eugene B. Cooper, E. Charles Healey, Kenneth O. St. Louis, Ashley Craig, Martin R. Adams, Robert W. Quesal, Mark Onslow and Ehud Yairi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Fluency Disorders

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Fluency Disorders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Fluency Disorders.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Fluency Disorders

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Fluency Disorders. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Fluency Disorders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Fluency Disorders more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025