Robert Wicks

28 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers

Robert Wicks
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Philosophy 126
  • Museology 38
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 48
  • Archeology 8
  • History and Philosophy of Science 31
Replace Michael Ann Holly with:
Michael Ann Holly United States
Krzysztof Pomian France
bill brown United States
Margaret Iversen United Kingdom
Randolph Starn United States
Lionel Gossman United States
Andrew Ellis Benjamin Bulgaria
Denis Hollier
Stephanie Takaragawa United States
Catherine Maxwell United Kingdom
Robert Wicks relative to Michael Ann Holly United States Michael Ann Holly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Michael Ann Holly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Wicks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Wicks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Wicks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Wicks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Wicks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Wicks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Wicks. The network helps show where Robert Wicks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Robert Wicks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Wicks Line = papers co-authored together Robert Wicks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992162
2 199376
3 199524
4 198818
5 199713
6 199310
7 19977
8 19956
9 19896
10
Hegel's Theory of Aesthetic Judgment
19946
11 20086
12 20056
13 19885
14 19944
15 19994
16 20034
17 19923
18 19993
19
Schopenhauer's 'The World as Will and Representation': A Reader's Guide
20113
20 20072

About Robert Wicks

Robert Wicks is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Arts and Humanities, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Architecture and Museology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (6 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (3 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (2 papers), Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (2 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (2 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (126 citations), Museology (38 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (48 citations), Archeology (8 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (31 citations). Robert Wicks has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Paul Guyer, H. S. Harris, Michael Förster, Robert B. Pippin, Peter Hylton, Thomas E. Wartenberg, John W. Burbıdge, Kenneth R. Westphal, Laurence Dickey and John Toews. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, The British Journal of Aesthetics, The Philosophical Review, The Southern Journal of Philosophy and European Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026