The British Journal of Aesthetics

1.8k papers and 8.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in The British Journal of Aesthetics in the last decades have received a total of 8.3k indexed citations. Papers published in The British Journal of Aesthetics usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (485 papers), Philosophy (399 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (396 papers) specifically the topics of Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (301 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (292 papers) and Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (264 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The British Journal of Aesthetics are Berys Gaut, Jerrold Levinson, Harold Osborne, L. Gregory Jones, Nicky Hallett, Stephen Davies, Noël Carroll, Michael P. Brady, Robert Stecker and Nick Zangwill.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The British Journal of Aesthetics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The British Journal of Aesthetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The British Journal of Aesthetics.

Countries where authors publish in The British Journal of Aesthetics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The British Journal of Aesthetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The British Journal of Aesthetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The British Journal of Aesthetics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025