Lionel Gossman
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- History top 1%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Co-authors
- Albert J. WehrleStephen BannRaymond BirnRobert DarntonJohn McMannersMichaël MoriartyAnn RigneyRitchie Robertson
- Topics
- Renaissance Literature and Culture (7 papers)Historical and Literary Studies (7 papers)French Literature and Criticism (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Lionel Gossman
52 papers receiving 271 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Sociology and Political Science 131
- Literature and Literary Theory 103
- History 97
- Philosophy 90
- Political Science and International Relations 74
Countries citing papers authored by Lionel Gossman
This map shows the geographic impact of Lionel Gossman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lionel Gossman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lionel Gossman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lionel Gossman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lionel Gossman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lionel Gossman. The network helps show where Lionel Gossman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lionel Gossman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lionel Gossman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lionel Gossman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lionel Gossman. Lionel Gossman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | The making of a romantic icon : the religious context of Friedrich Overbeck's Italia und Germania | 0 |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | Michelet and natural history: the Alibi of nature | 3 |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | Moliere and Tartuffe: Law and Order in the Seventeenth Century. | 0 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Lionel Gossman
Lionel Gossman is a scholar working on Classics, Space and Planetary Science and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 70 papers that have together received 449 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance Literature and Culture (7 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (7 papers) and French Literature and Criticism (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (103 citations), History (97 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (41 citations). Lionel Gossman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Albert J. Wehrle, Stephen Bann, Raymond Birn, Robert Darnton, John McManners, Michaël Moriarty, Ann Rigney, Ritchie Robertson, Dominick LaCapra and Roger Hausheer. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Language Journal, The American Historical Review and The Modern Language Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.