Robert W. Hanning
Impact in
Papers in
- Classics 20
- Medieval Literature and History 18
- Medieval Iberian Studies 3
-
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 5
- Themes in Literature Analysis 1
- Co-authors
- R. Howard Bloch (1 shared paper)David Rosand (1 shared paper)Denys Hay (1 shared paper)Charles F. Mullett (1 shared paper)David Cast (1 shared paper)Ian Donaldson (1 shared paper)Oleg Grabar (1 shared paper)Susan Fraiman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Speculum (5 papers)Studies in the age of Chaucer (2 papers)Comparative drama (1 paper)The Art Bulletin (1 paper)Signs (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Robert W. Hanning
11 papers receiving 60 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Classics 107
- History 63
- Literature and Literary Theory 37
- Language and Linguistics 33
- History and Philosophy of Science 7
Countries citing papers authored by Robert W. Hanning
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert W. Hanning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert W. Hanning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert W. Hanning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert W. Hanning
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert W. Hanning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert W. Hanning. The network helps show where Robert W. Hanning may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert W. Hanning, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1979 | 44 | |
| 2 | Castiglione: The Ideal and the Real in Renaissance Culture | 1983 | 24 |
| 3 | 1968 | 19 | |
| 4 | The lais of Marie de France | 1978 | 19 |
| 5 | 1981 | 12 | |
| 6 | 1967 | 9 | |
| 7 | 1979 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1977 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1985 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1973 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1974 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1987 | 1 |
About Robert W. Hanning
Robert W. Hanning is a scholar working on Classics, Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, History and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 163 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (18 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (5 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (3 papers), Medieval Iberian Studies (3 papers), Medieval European Literature and History (3 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers) and Themes in Literature Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (107 citations), History (63 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (37 citations), Language and Linguistics (33 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (7 citations). Robert W. Hanning has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include R. Howard Bloch, David Rosand, Denys Hay, Charles F. Mullett, David Cast, Ian Donaldson, Oleg Grabar, Susan Fraiman, Patricia Yaeger and Robert Scholes. Their work appears in journals such as Speculum, Studies in the age of Chaucer, Comparative drama, The Art Bulletin and Signs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.