Comparative drama

835 papers and 1.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 835 papers published in Comparative drama in the last decades have received a total of 1.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Comparative drama usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (366 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (162 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (156 papers) specifically the topics of Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (177 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (150 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (119 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Comparative drama are Brian Richardson, Maurice Hunt, Hans‐Jürgen Diller, Derek Hughes, David Scott Kastan, Enoch Brater, Clifford Davidson, Andrew Sofer, David Bevington and Jody Enders.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Comparative drama

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Comparative drama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comparative drama.

Countries where authors publish in Comparative drama

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comparative drama. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comparative drama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparative drama more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025