Jocelyn Wogan-Browne
- Classics top 0.5%
- Medieval Literature and History 7
- History top 1%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 3
- Religious studies top 10%
- Christian Theology and Mission 1
- Language and Linguistics top 10%
- Linguistics and language evolution 2
- Lexicography and Language Studies 1
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Digital Humanities and Scholarship 1
-
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 1
-
- Geographic Information Systems Studies 1
- Cited by
- ClassicsHistoryReligious studies
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (2 papers)Speculum (2 papers)Forum for Modern Language Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jocelyn Wogan-Browne
14 papers receiving 88 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Classics 157
- History 108
- Religious studies 16
- Language and Linguistics 27
- Literature and Literary Theory 27
Countries citing papers authored by Jocelyn Wogan-Browne
This map shows the geographic impact of Jocelyn Wogan-Browne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jocelyn Wogan-Browne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jocelyn Wogan-Browne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jocelyn Wogan-Browne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jocelyn Wogan-Browne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jocelyn Wogan-Browne. The network helps show where Jocelyn Wogan-Browne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Jocelyn Wogan-Browne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 2 | The Middle English "Mirror": An Edition Based on Bodleian Library, MS Holkham misc. 40 | 2005 | 1 |
| 3 | 2004 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 4 | |
| 5 | 'Reading is Good Prayer': Recent Research on Female Reading Communities | 2002 | 3 |
| 6 | 2001 | 17 | |
| 7 | Concordances to the Katherine Group, MS. Bodley 34, and the Wooing Group, MSS Nero A XIV and Titus D XVIII | 2000 | 2 |
| 8 | 2000 | 78 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 37 | |
| 10 | New Trends in Feminine Spirituality: The Holy Women of Liege and their Impact. | 1999 | 6 |
| 11 | The idea of the vernacular | 1999 | 6 |
| 12 | 1999 | 11 | |
| 13 | Concordance to Ancrene wisse : MS Corpus Christi College Cambridge 402 | 1993 | 3 |
| 14 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 8 |
About Jocelyn Wogan-Browne
Jocelyn Wogan-Browne is a scholar working on Classics, Language and Linguistics and History, having authored 16 papers that have together received 183 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (7 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (2 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Christian Theology and Mission (1 paper), Geographic Information Systems Studies (1 paper), Lexicography and Language Studies (1 paper) and Digital Humanities and Scholarship (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (157 citations), History (108 citations) and Religious studies (16 citations). Jocelyn Wogan-Browne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Watson, Andrew Taylor, Ruth Evans, David Aers and Lesley Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Speculum and Forum for Modern Language Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.