Robert van Rooij
- Artificial Intelligence top 1%
- Health Informatics top 0.05%
- Language and Linguistics top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 2%
- Co-authors
- Claudi BocktingWillem ZuidemaEva A.M. van DisKatrin SchulzDavid RipleyPablo CobrerosPaul ÉgréGerhard Jäger
- Topics
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (27 papers)Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (14 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsFranceSpain
In The Last Decade
Robert van Rooij
59 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Artificial Intelligence 1.2k
- Health Informatics 733
- Language and Linguistics 488
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 420
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 342
Countries citing papers authored by Robert van Rooij
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert van Rooij's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert van Rooij with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert van Rooij more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert van Rooij
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert van Rooij. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert van Rooij. The network helps show where Robert van Rooij may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert van Rooij
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert van Rooij. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert van Rooij based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert van Rooij. Robert van Rooij is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 40 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | Learning biases may prevent lexicalization of pragmatic inferences: a case study combining iterated (Bayesian) learning and functional selection. | 2 |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 115 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | The propositional and relational syllogistic | 3 |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | Relevance-Based Partition Semantics for Why-Questions | 2 |
| 17 | 59 | |
| 18 | Comparatives and quantifiers | 15 |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | Private international law in the Netherlands | 2 |
About Robert van Rooij
Robert van Rooij is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Health Informatics and Language and Linguistics, having authored 62 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (27 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (14 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (733 citations), Language and Linguistics (488 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (1.2k citations). Robert van Rooij has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, France and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Claudi Bockting, Willem Zuidema, Eva A.M. van Dis, Katrin Schulz, David Ripley, Pablo Cobreros, Paul Égré, Gerhard Jäger, Anton Benz and Michael Franke. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.