Bart Verheij

5.4k total citations
123 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Bart Verheij is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Bart Verheij has authored 123 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 80 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 37 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Bart Verheij's work include Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (59 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (43 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Law (34 papers). Bart Verheij is often cited by papers focused on Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (59 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (43 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Law (34 papers). Bart Verheij collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Bart Verheij's co-authors include Henry Prakken, Rineke Verbrugge, Floris Bex, Frans H. van Eemeren, Jaap Hage, Bart Garssen, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Erik C. W. Krabbe, Jean H. M. Wagemans and Silja Renooij and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Artificial Intelligence.

In The Last Decade

Bart Verheij

115 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bart Verheij Netherlands 26 1.6k 554 247 198 197 123 2.2k
Henry Prakken Netherlands 32 3.4k 2.2× 1.0k 1.8× 331 1.3× 313 1.6× 344 1.7× 134 4.0k
Giovanni Sartor Italy 24 1.9k 1.2× 765 1.4× 267 1.1× 196 1.0× 347 1.8× 207 2.6k
Trevor Bench‐Capon United Kingdom 34 3.6k 2.3× 1.2k 2.2× 322 1.3× 355 1.8× 288 1.5× 208 4.2k
Katie Atkinson United Kingdom 20 1.2k 0.7× 364 0.7× 115 0.5× 108 0.5× 90 0.5× 124 1.4k
John Zeleznikow Australia 21 655 0.4× 542 1.0× 199 0.8× 239 1.2× 157 0.8× 169 1.5k
Edwina L. Rissland United States 23 1.1k 0.7× 527 1.0× 32 0.1× 144 0.7× 168 0.9× 48 1.6k
Kevin D. Ashley United States 26 1.5k 1.0× 1.1k 1.9× 51 0.2× 293 1.5× 409 2.1× 103 2.1k
Leendert van der Torre Luxembourg 28 2.4k 1.5× 148 0.3× 459 1.9× 100 0.5× 35 0.2× 258 3.0k
David A. Schum United States 18 547 0.3× 179 0.3× 118 0.5× 164 0.8× 196 1.0× 56 1.3k
Adam M. Smith United States 22 864 0.5× 216 0.4× 728 2.9× 307 1.6× 50 0.3× 87 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Bart Verheij

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bart Verheij's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bart Verheij with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bart Verheij more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bart Verheij

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bart Verheij. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bart Verheij. The network helps show where Bart Verheij may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bart Verheij

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bart Verheij. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bart Verheij based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bart Verheij. Bart Verheij is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Renooij, Silja, et al.. (2025). Parameterized Argumentation-based Reasoning Tasks for Benchmarking Generative Language Models. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 455–459.
2.
Grossi, Davide, et al.. (2024). A Fortiori Case-Based Reasoning: From Theory to Data. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 81. 401–441.
3.
Grossi, Davide, et al.. (2023). Hierarchical Precedential Constraint. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 333–342. 1 indexed citations
4.
Cao, Ming, et al.. (2023). Explain What You See: Open-Ended Segmentation and Recognition of Occluded 3D Objects. 31. 4960–4966. 1 indexed citations
5.
Cao, Ming, et al.. (2021). Local-HDP: Interactive open-ended 3D object category recognition in real-time robotic scenarios. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 147. 103911–103911. 8 indexed citations
6.
Cao, Ming, et al.. (2021). Argumentation-Based Online Incremental Learning. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering. 19(4). 3419–3433. 7 indexed citations
7.
Verbrugge, Rineke, et al.. (2020). A Discussion Game for the Grounded Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks.. 431–442.
8.
Francesconi, Enrico & Bart Verheij. (2013). Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. 10 indexed citations
9.
Verbrugge, Rineke, et al.. (2013). How much does it help to know what she knows you know? An agent-based simulation study. Artificial Intelligence. 199-200. 67–92. 44 indexed citations
10.
Verbrugge, Rineke, et al.. (2012). Higher-order social cognition in rock-paper-scissors: a simulation study. Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems. 1195–1196. 3 indexed citations
11.
Verheij, Bart, Pietro Baroni, Federico Cerutti, Massimiliano Giacomin, & Guillermo Ricardo Simari. (2010). Argumentation and rules with exceptions. 216. 2 indexed citations
12.
Hitchcock, David & Bart Verheij. (2010). Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)). 20 indexed citations
13.
Verheij, Bart. (2007). A labeling approach to the computation of credulous acceptance in argumentation. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 623–628. 36 indexed citations
14.
Verheij, Bart. (2007). 20TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 14 indexed citations
15.
Hitchcock, David & Bart Verheij. (2007). Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation (Argumentation Library). Springer eBooks. 2 indexed citations
16.
Verheij, Bart, et al.. (2007). Beyond boxes and arrows: argumentation support in terms of the knowledge structure of a legal topic. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 109–118. 2 indexed citations
17.
Verheij, Bart. (2003). Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation. Artificial Intelligence. 150(1-2). 291–324. 74 indexed citations
18.
Verheij, Bart. (2001). Anchored narratives and dialectical argumentation. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 3 indexed citations
19.
Lodder, A.R. & Bart Verheij. (1999). Computer-mediated legal argument: towards new opportunities in education. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). 2(2). 1–20. 8 indexed citations
20.
Verheij, Bart, et al.. (1999). De Logica van de Onrechtmatige Daad. 16(4). 95–102. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026