Robert Kirk

58 papers receiving 893 citations

Peers

Robert Kirk
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
  • Geography, Planning and Development 191
  • Small Animals 162
  • History and Philosophy of Science 98
  • Genetics 204
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 196
Replace Abhirami Ratnakumar with:
Abhirami Ratnakumar United States
Mark Jago United Kingdom
J. Stuart Bradley Australia
Kate A. Bryant Australia
Bernardino Fantini Switzerland
Adam Hartstone‐Rose United States
Felix M. Key Germany
Jerrold Tannenbaum United States
Daniel J. Wescott United States
Jonathan R. Potts United Kingdom
Robert Kirk relative to Abhirami Ratnakumar United States Abhirami Ratnakumar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×32.7×
Abhirami Ratnakumar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Kirk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Kirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Kirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Kirk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Kirk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Kirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Kirk. The network helps show where Robert Kirk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Kirk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Kirk Line = papers co-authored together Robert Kirk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017146
2 2023105
3 201876
4 201652
5 200844
6 201044
7 201239
8 195536
9 202034
10 201233
11 201531
12 201430
13 195424
14 196922
15 201322
16
First description of à monogenetic trematode from Malawi.
196718
17 199118
18 201418
19 201417
20 195616

About Robert Kirk

Robert Kirk is a scholar working on Small Animals, Geography, Planning and Development, History, History and Philosophy of Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal testing and alternatives (11 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (10 papers), Medical History and Innovations (6 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (5 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (4 papers), Zoonotic diseases and public health (4 papers), Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment (4 papers) and Historical Medical Research and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (191 citations), Small Animals (162 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (98 citations), Genetics (204 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (196 citations). Robert Kirk has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sudan. Frequent co-authors include David J. Lewis, Amy Zhang, Edward Grefenstette, Tim Rocktäschel, Gail F. Davies, Pru Hobson‐West, Beth Greenhough, David J. Lewis, Edmund Ramsden and Conrad C. Labandeira. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Environment and History, Medical Humanities, Medical History and Science Technology & Human Values.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact