Emma Roe

2.1k citations
47 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 18

Emma Roe

43 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Emma Roe
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Geography, Planning and Development 342
  • Small Animals 449
  • Speech and Hearing 100
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 140
  • Genetics 368
Replace Candace Croney with:
Candace Croney United States
Thomas Bøker Lund Denmark
Jesper Lassen Denmark
Bernard E. Rollin United States
Clare Palmer United States
Vonne Lund Norway
Sarah Zito Australia
Catherine A. Schuppli Canada
Raphaëlle Botreau France
Kirrilly Thompson Australia
Emma Roe relative to Candace Croney United States Candace Croney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Candace Croney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Roe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Roe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Roe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Roe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Roe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Roe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Roe. The network helps show where Emma Roe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Roe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Roe Line = papers co-authored together Emma Roe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20251
3 20242
4 20235
5 20236
6 202325
7 20232
8 20232
9 20221
10 202213
11 202114
12 202123
13 202027
14 202012
15 201962
16
Inspiring change: what motivational Interviewing can teach us about communicating herd health advice
20161
17
Using motivational interviewing in veterinarian-farmer communication: towards improved uptake of veterinary advice
20151
18
Certifying quality. Negotiating and integrating animal welfare into food assurance
20110
19 20081
20 200639

About Emma Roe

Emma Roe is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Small Animals and Business and International Management, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (17 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (16 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (11 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (6 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (5 papers), Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (5 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (342 citations), Small Animals (449 citations) and Speech and Hearing (100 citations). Emma Roe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Beth Greenhough, Henry Buller, B.B. Bock, Isabelle Veissier, Andrew Butterworth, Kristen K. Reyher, Anne M. Haase, Alison Bard, Helen R. Whay and David Main. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Welfare, BMC Medicine, Environment and Planning A Economy and Space, Environment and Planning D Society and Space and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026