Mark Jago
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy top 1%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 14
- Philosophy 32
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 23
- Co-authors
- Francesco Berto (2 shared papers)Stephen Barker (3 shared papers)Pierre du Preez (7 shared papers)Greg Stuart‐Hill (3 shared papers)Robin Naidoo (3 shared papers)E. C. Anderson (3 shared papers)Martin Wegmann (2 shared papers)Ken Wallace (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Synthese (9 papers)Analysis (7 papers)Mind (4 papers)Journal of Wildlife Diseases (3 papers)Journal of Environmental Management (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaNamibia
In The Last Decade
Mark Jago
78 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- History and Philosophy of Science 133
- Philosophy 298
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 319
- Small Animals 143
- Equine 23
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Jago
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Jago's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Jago with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Jago more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Jago
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Jago. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Jago. The network helps show where Mark Jago may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Jago, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 96 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 58 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 54 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 53 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 45 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 44 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 42 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 39 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 35 | |
| 11 | Impossible Worlds | 2019 | 32 |
| 12 | 2018 | 29 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 22 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 20 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 18 |
About Mark Jago
Mark Jago is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Agronomy and Crop Science and Small Animals, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (34 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (29 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (23 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (14 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (10 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (9 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (8 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (133 citations), Philosophy (298 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (319 citations), Small Animals (143 citations) and Equine (23 citations). Mark Jago has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Namibia. Frequent co-authors include Francesco Berto, Stephen Barker, Pierre du Preez, Greg Stuart‐Hill, Robin Naidoo, E. C. Anderson, Martin Wegmann, Ken Wallace, Laurie Marker and Karen A. Terio. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Analysis, Mind, Journal of Wildlife Diseases and Journal of Environmental Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.