Beth Greenhough

1.7k total citations
55 papers, 831 citations indexed

About

Beth Greenhough is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Genetics and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Beth Greenhough has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 831 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Geography, Planning and Development, 18 papers in Genetics and 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Beth Greenhough's work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (24 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (12 papers) and Animal testing and alternatives (9 papers). Beth Greenhough is often cited by papers focused on Geographies of human-animal interactions (24 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (12 papers) and Animal testing and alternatives (9 papers). Beth Greenhough collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Beth Greenhough's co-authors include Emma Roe, Gail Davies, Pru Hobson‐West, Robert Kirk, Isabel Dyck, Tim Brown, Jamie Lorimer, Richard Grenyer, Alexandra Palmer and Carmen McLeod and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Beth Greenhough

51 papers receiving 799 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Beth Greenhough United Kingdom	19	396	224	176	105	105	55	831
Leslie Irvine United States	19	357 0.9×	525 2.3×	387 2.2×	103 1.0×	76 0.7×	46	1.4k
Lori Gruen United States	12	266 0.7×	170 0.8×	151 0.9×	32 0.3×	78 0.7×	44	685
Vinciane Despret Belgium	15	710 1.8×	334 1.5×	336 1.9×	49 0.5×	31 0.3×	79	1.4k
Carol J. Adams United States	18	414 1.0×	266 1.2×	287 1.6×	20 0.2×	81 0.8×	53	1.3k
Harriet Ritvo United States	14	401 1.0×	178 0.8×	206 1.2×	28 0.3×	35 0.3×	55	1.1k
Carrie Friese United Kingdom	14	124 0.3×	113 0.5×	99 0.6×	178 1.7×	56 0.5×	28	677
Josephine Donovan United States	13	400 1.0×	217 1.0×	310 1.8×	14 0.1×	65 0.6×	45	1.1k
Marianne Elisabeth Lien Norway	18	303 0.8×	61 0.3×	242 1.4×	40 0.4×	19 0.2×	53	989
Amy Fitzgerald Canada	16	214 0.5×	235 1.0×	426 2.4×	45 0.4×	30 0.3×	38	1.4k
Rosemary‐Claire Collard Canada	16	552 1.4×	190 0.8×	251 1.4×	31 0.3×	17 0.2×	34	989

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Greenhough

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Greenhough's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Greenhough with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Greenhough more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Greenhough

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Greenhough. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Greenhough. The network helps show where Beth Greenhough may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beth Greenhough

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beth Greenhough. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beth Greenhough based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Beth Greenhough. Beth Greenhough is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Montana, Jasper, A. E. Bennett, Beth Greenhough, et al.. (2025). Ten facts from critical and interpretive social sciences for environmental research. iScience. 28(6). 112736–112736. 1 indexed citations

Greenhough, Beth, et al.. (2024). Creating safety amidst chronic contamination: A mixed-method analysis of residents’ experiences in a Southern Italian steel town. Social Science & Medicine. 349. 116866–116866.

Greenhough, Beth, et al.. (2024). Mapping Microbial Selves: Field Notes from a Dirty Parenting Project. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11(1). 1–17. 1 indexed citations

Greenhough, Beth, et al.. (2024). When you can't find the words: Using body mapping to communicate patients' experiences of Long Covid. Health & Place. 89. 103302–103302.

Palmer, Alexandra, et al.. (2023). What Do Scientists Mean When They Talk About Research Animals “Volunteering”?. Society and Animals. 32(7-8). 744–765. 2 indexed citations

Anderson, Ben, et al.. (2022). Encountering Berlant part two: Cruel and other optimisms. Geographical Journal. 189(1). 143–160. 13 indexed citations

Palmer, Alexandra, et al.. (2021). Edge cases in animal research law: Constituting the regulatory borderlands of the UK's Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 90. 122–130. 5 indexed citations

Roe, Emma & Beth Greenhough. (2021). A good life? A good death? Reconciling care and harm in animal research. Social & Cultural Geography. 24(1). 49–66. 23 indexed citations

Davies, Gail, Richard Gorman, Beth Greenhough, et al.. (2020). Animal research nexus: a new approach to the connections between science, health and animal welfare. Medical Humanities. 46(4). 499–511. 27 indexed citations

10.

Palmer, Alexandra, Beth Greenhough, Pru Hobson‐West, et al.. (2020). Animal Research beyond the Laboratory: Report from a Workshop on Places Other than Licensed Establishments (POLEs) in the UK. Animals. 10(10). 1868–1868. 4 indexed citations

11.

Greenhough, Beth. (2019). The promises and pitfalls of specifying situatedness. Dialogues in Human Geography. 9(2). 162–165. 2 indexed citations

12.

Lorimer, Jamie, et al.. (2019). Making the microbiome public: Participatory experiments with DNA sequencing in domestic kitchens. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 44(3). 524–541. 20 indexed citations

13.

Brown, Tim, et al.. (2019). “They say it's more aggressive in black women”: Biosociality, breast cancer, and becoming a population “at risk”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 44(3). 509–523. 5 indexed citations

14.

Greenhough, Beth, et al.. (2018). Unsettling antibiosis: how might interdisciplinary researchers generate a feeling for the microbiome and to what effect?. Palgrave Communications. 4(1). 29 indexed citations

15.

Greenhough, Beth, Isabel Dyck, Tim Brown, et al.. (2016). Evaluating a DVD promoting breast cancer awareness among black women aged 25–50 years in East London. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 70(7). 678–682. 3 indexed citations

16.

Greenhough, Beth, et al.. (2016). Bodies Across Borders. ANU Open Research (Australian National University). 9 indexed citations

17.

Greenhough, Beth. (2010). A logic of care beyond health geography. Area. 42(1). 136–138. 3 indexed citations

18.

Greenhough, Beth & Emma Roe. (2010). From Ethical Principles to Response-Able Practice. Environment and Planning D Society and Space. 28(1). 43–45. 35 indexed citations

19.

Greenhough, Beth & Emma Roe. (2006). Towards a Geography of Bodily Biotechnologies. Environment and Planning A Economy and Space. 38(3). 416–422. 32 indexed citations

20.

Clark, Nigel, Beth Greenhough, & Tariq Jazeel. (2006). Reply When response becomes responsibility. Geographical Journal. 172(3). 248–250. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact