Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Collaborative Communication in Interfirm Relationships: Moderating Effects of Integration and Control
1996678 citationsJakki J. Mohr, Robert J. Fisher et al.Journal of Marketingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert J. Fisher
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert J. Fisher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert J. Fisher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert J. Fisher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert J. Fisher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert J. Fisher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert J. Fisher. The network helps show where Robert J. Fisher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert J. Fisher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert J. Fisher.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert J. Fisher based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert J. Fisher. Robert J. Fisher is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fisher, Robert J.. (2013). Review of poverty reduction in the Doi Mae Salong landscape project. IUCN eBooks.1 indexed citations
5.
Fisher, Robert J., et al.. (2012). Unusual partnerships : lessons for landscapes and livelihoods from the Doe Mae Salong landscape, Thailand. USC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast).1 indexed citations
DeFilippis, James, Robert J. Fisher, & Éric Shragge. (2009). What's Left in the Community? Oppositional Politics in Contemporary Practice. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
8.
Fisher, Robert J., et al.. (2008). Community Organization and New Social Movement Theory. Journal of Progressive Human Services.1 indexed citations
9.
Fisher, Robert J.. (2007). Teaching Thinking in the Classroom.. Education Canada. 47(2). 72–74.5 indexed citations
10.
Grégoire, Yany & Robert J. Fisher. (2005). Gender Differences in Decision Satisfaction within Established Dyads: Effects of Competitive and Cooperative Behaviors. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
Mohr, Jakki J., Robert J. Fisher, & John R. Nevin. (1998). Communicating for Better Channel Relationship. SSRN Electronic Journal.23 indexed citations
16.
Fisher, Robert J. & Gerard J. Tellis. (1998). Removing Social Desirability Bias With Indirect Questioning: Is the Cure Worse Than the Disease?. ACR North American Advances.70 indexed citations
Fisher, Robert J., et al.. (1997). Enhancing Communication Between Marketing and Engineering. 31(10). 96–102.1 indexed citations
19.
Fisher, Robert J. & David S. Ackerman. (1997). The Effects of Recognition and Group Need on Volunteerism: A Social Norm Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.