Robert G. Picard

5.0k total citations
165 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Robert G. Picard is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Urban Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert G. Picard has authored 165 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 23 papers in Strategy and Management and 22 papers in Urban Studies. Recurrent topics in Robert G. Picard's work include Cultural Industries and Urban Development (22 papers), Media Influence and Politics (20 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (17 papers). Robert G. Picard is often cited by papers focused on Cultural Industries and Urban Development (22 papers), Media Influence and Politics (20 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (17 papers). Robert G. Picard collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and United States. Robert G. Picard's co-authors include Lucia Naldi, Lucy Küng, Ruth Towse, A. Hervé, C. Santier, Allan Brown, Piet Bakker, Richard van der Wurff, D. Block and R. Helbig and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Review of Scientific Instruments and Solid State Communications.

In The Last Decade

Robert G. Picard

152 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert G. Picard United Kingdom 26 981 930 568 282 233 165 2.4k
Philip M. Napoli United States 27 1.5k 1.5× 1.5k 1.6× 360 0.6× 225 0.8× 187 0.8× 113 2.8k
Robert W. McChesney United States 25 1.2k 1.2× 1.2k 1.3× 243 0.4× 94 0.3× 261 1.1× 110 2.9k
Vincent Mosco Canada 23 787 0.8× 1.3k 1.4× 157 0.3× 99 0.4× 188 0.8× 110 2.7k
John Dimmick United States 22 938 1.0× 1.3k 1.4× 225 0.4× 173 0.6× 87 0.4× 42 2.0k
Terry Flew Australia 26 861 0.9× 1.1k 1.2× 155 0.3× 104 0.4× 217 0.9× 172 2.5k
John Hartley Australia 31 900 0.9× 1.1k 1.2× 110 0.2× 115 0.4× 190 0.8× 166 3.0k
Janet W. Salaff Canada 18 488 0.5× 1.5k 1.6× 289 0.5× 75 0.3× 233 1.0× 64 2.8k
Richard R. John United States 14 643 0.7× 859 0.9× 94 0.2× 281 1.0× 230 1.0× 88 2.3k
Nichòlas Garnham United Kingdom 19 511 0.5× 901 1.0× 115 0.2× 48 0.2× 257 1.1× 56 2.1k
David Croteau United States 13 984 1.0× 1.2k 1.3× 166 0.3× 65 0.2× 76 0.3× 22 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Robert G. Picard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert G. Picard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert G. Picard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert G. Picard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert G. Picard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert G. Picard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert G. Picard. The network helps show where Robert G. Picard may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert G. Picard

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert G. Picard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert G. Picard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert G. Picard. Robert G. Picard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zotto, Cinzia Dal, et al.. (2024). Audience analytics and tensions in digital news work: evidence from Swiss news media. Information Technology and People. 38(4). 1991–2014.
2.
Picard, Robert G., et al.. (2023). Shaping User-Centered Health Innovation Through Assessment. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository. 229–242.
3.
Zotto, Cinzia Dal, et al.. (2022). The Nature of Work in the Media Industries: A Literature Review and Future Directions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 157–181. 3 indexed citations
4.
Picard, Robert G. & Sora Park. (2021). Examining the Australian Digital Platforms Inquiry and theorizing ‘accidental policy’. 12(2). 247–271. 4 indexed citations
5.
Sehl, Annika, Richard Fletcher, & Robert G. Picard. (2020). Crowding out: Is there evidence that public service media harm markets? A cross-national comparative analysis of commercial television and online news providers. European Journal of Communication. 35(4). 389–409. 22 indexed citations
6.
Villi, Mikko, et al.. (2019). “They’re a little bit squeezed in the middle”: Strategic challenges for innovation in US Metropolitan newspaper organisations. Journal of Media Business Studies. 17(1). 33–50. 18 indexed citations
7.
Villi, Mikko, et al.. (2018). Comparing Innovation and Social Media Strategies in Scandinavian andUS Newspapers. Digital Journalism. 6(8). 1029–1040. 39 indexed citations
8.
Ranchordás, Sofia, Valérie Bélair‐Gagnon, & Robert G. Picard. (2016). The Impact of Charity and Tax Law and Regulation on Not-for-Profit News Organizations. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
9.
Picard, Robert G., Charles H. Davis, Franco Papandrea, & Sora Park. (2015). Platform proliferation and its implications for domestic content policies. Telematics and Informatics. 33(2). 683–692. 10 indexed citations
10.
Ots, Märt & Robert G. Picard. (2015). A new chapter in the history ofJournal of Media Business Studies. Journal of Media Business Studies. 12(1). 1–2. 1 indexed citations
11.
Joseph, P.A., et al.. (2015). Living Labs Health and Autonomy: What place for users and clinicians? The example of the French APPROCHE Association. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 58. e54–e55. 2 indexed citations
12.
Picard, Robert G.. (2014). Public opinion, party politics, policy, and immigration news in the United Kingdom. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 1 indexed citations
13.
Picard, Robert G.. (2014). Las industrias informativas: ¿tienen futuro?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
14.
Picard, Robert G.. (2014). Las industrias informativas: ¿tienen futuro?. Palabra Clave. 17(4). 1069–1096. 3 indexed citations
15.
Picard, Robert G.. (2014). Médecine personnalisée : de quoi parle-t-on ? une vision prospective. Annales des Mines - Réalités industrielles. Novembre 2014(4). 99–106. 1 indexed citations
16.
Achtenhagen, Leona & Robert G. Picard. (2014). Challenges and success factors in media cluster development: a review of contemporary knowledge. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 221–251. 1 indexed citations
17.
Pino, Maribel, Samuel Benveniste, Hélène Kerhervé, et al.. (2013). Contribution of the Living Lab approach to the development, assessment and provision of assistive technologies for supporting older adults with cognitive disorders.. 11. 34–62. 7 indexed citations
18.
Picard, Robert G., et al.. (2011). Need for ICTs Assessment in the Health Sector: A Multidimensional Framework. SSRN Electronic Journal. 83(3). 87–108. 12 indexed citations
19.
Wurff, Richard van der, Piet Bakker, & Robert G. Picard. (2008). Economic Growth and Advertising Expenditures in Different Media in Different Countries. Journal of Media Economics. 21(1). 28–52. 52 indexed citations
20.
Picard, Robert G., et al.. (2004). ISSUES IN ASSESSMENT OF THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF COPYRIGHT. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1(1). 27–40. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026