Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action.
19942.3k citationsRobert G. Eccles et al.profile →
The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance
20141.9k citationsRobert G. Eccles, Ioannis Ioannou et al.profile →
Price, Authority, and Trust: From Ideal Types to Plural Forms
19891.4k citationsRobert G. Eccles et al.profile →
Countries citing papers authored by Robert G. Eccles
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert G. Eccles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert G. Eccles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert G. Eccles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert G. Eccles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert G. Eccles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert G. Eccles. The network helps show where Robert G. Eccles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert G. Eccles
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert G. Eccles.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert G. Eccles based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert G. Eccles. Robert G. Eccles is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Williams, Cynthia A., et al.. (2019). Climate Change and Directors' Duties: Closing the Gap Between Legal Obligation and Enforcement Practice. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Eccles, Robert G. & Michael P. Krzus. (2014). The Integrated Reporting Movement: Meaning, Momentum, Motives, and Materiality.. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).86 indexed citations
5.
Eccles, Robert G., et al.. (2013). Innovation at the Boston Consulting Group. 1(5). 22–3.1 indexed citations
Eccles, Robert G., Ioannis Ioannou, & George Serafeim. (2012). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. London Business School Research Online (London Business School).3 indexed citations
Eccles, Robert G., et al.. (2010). Southwest Airlines One ReportTM. 72(1). 12–4.2 indexed citations
12.
Eccles, Robert G. & Michael P. Krzus. (2010). One Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 12(10). 739–42, 744, 746.485 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Eccles, Robert G. & Thomas H. Davenport. (2010). Cognizant 2.0: Embedding Community and Knowledge into Work Processes Embedding. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
14.
Eccles, Robert G. & Michael P. Krzus. (2010). Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy: One Report has the potential to significantly change how companies operate and investors think, shifting the focus from that of meeting short-term financial goals to developing a long-term business strategy that not only makes a commitment to corporate social responsibility, but also to a sustainable society. 26(2). 28–33.12 indexed citations
15.
Eccles, Robert G. & Michael P. Krzus. (2010). A Chronology of Integrated Reporting. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.