Robert Frengley

805 total citations
8 papers, 251 citations indexed

About

Robert Frengley is a scholar working on Physiology, Emergency Medical Services and Emergency Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert Frengley has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 251 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Physiology, 4 papers in Emergency Medical Services and 3 papers in Emergency Medicine. Recurrent topics in Robert Frengley's work include Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (5 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers). Robert Frengley is often cited by papers focused on Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (5 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers). Robert Frengley collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United Kingdom. Robert Frengley's co-authors include Jennifer Weller, Boaz Shulruf, Jane Torrie, Nolan McDonnell, Brian Jolly, Michal Boyd, Alexander Garden, Chris Frampton, Matthew Boyd and Jill Torrie and has published in prestigious journals such as Critical Care Medicine, British Journal of Anaesthesia and BMJ Quality & Safety.

In The Last Decade

Robert Frengley

8 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Robert Frengley New Zealand	7	116	103	72	51	47	8	251
Toni Beth Walzer United States	6	122 1.1×	132 1.3×	58 0.8×	65 1.3×	54 1.1×	6	299
Amy Nichols United States	8	164 1.4×	73 0.7×	108 1.5×	60 1.2×	65 1.4×	13	292
Anna Clebone United States	8	55 0.5×	85 0.8×	46 0.6×	20 0.4×	64 1.4×	18	255
Patricia McNamee United States	4	97 0.8×	148 1.4×	47 0.7×	76 1.5×	143 3.0×	5	330
Lone Fuhrmann Denmark	6	52 0.4×	98 1.0×	27 0.4×	23 0.5×	143 3.0×	12	252
Christine Bartlett United Kingdom	6	229 2.0×	69 0.7×	88 1.2×	84 1.6×	196 4.2×	7	418
Connie M. Lopez United States	4	197 1.7×	54 0.5×	118 1.6×	33 0.6×	54 1.1×	14	276
Haytham Qosa United Kingdom	2	217 1.9×	119 1.2×	96 1.3×	77 1.5×	74 1.6×	3	299
Ashley Merién Netherlands	6	136 1.2×	60 0.6×	95 1.3×	47 0.9×	139 3.0×	11	371
Patricia Livingston Canada	12	134 1.2×	59 0.6×	190 2.6×	46 0.9×	39 0.8×	33	333

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Frengley

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Frengley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Frengley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Frengley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Frengley

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Frengley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Frengley. The network helps show where Robert Frengley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Frengley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Frengley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Frengley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Frengley. Robert Frengley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Weller, Jennifer, Jane Torrie, Michal Boyd, et al.. (2014). Improving team information sharing with a structured call-out in anaesthetic emergencies: a randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 112(6). 1042–1049. 31 indexed citations

2.

Weller, Jennifer, et al.. (2013). Validation of a measurement tool for self-assessment of teamwork in intensive care. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 111(3). 460–467. 24 indexed citations

3.

Weller, Jennifer, et al.. (2012). Change in attitudes and performance of critical care teams after a multi-disciplinary simulation-based intervention. International Journal of Medical Education. 3. 124–131. 6 indexed citations

4.

Frengley, Robert, et al.. (2011). The effect of a simulation-based training intervention on the performance of established critical care unit teams*. Critical Care Medicine. 39(12). 2605–2611. 88 indexed citations

5.

Weller, Jennifer, et al.. (2011). Evaluation of an instrument to measure teamwork in multidisciplinary critical care teams. BMJ Quality & Safety. 20(3). 216–222. 57 indexed citations

6.

McDonnell, Nolan, et al.. (2008). In reply. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 17(2). 190–190. 1 indexed citations

7.

McDonnell, Nolan, et al.. (2007). Rapid reversal of critical haemodynamic compromise with nitric oxide in a parturient with amniotic fluid embolism. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 16(3). 269–273. 37 indexed citations

8.

Frengley, Robert, et al.. (2001). The Effect of Closed System Suction on Airway Pressures when using the Servo 300 Ventilator. Critical Care and Resuscitation. 3(4). 230–235. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact