Keith Couper

9.8k total citations · 3 hit papers
84 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Keith Couper is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Keith Couper has authored 84 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 65 papers in Emergency Medicine, 15 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 12 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Keith Couper's work include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (63 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (15 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (15 papers). Keith Couper is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (63 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (15 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (15 papers). Keith Couper collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Keith Couper's co-authors include Gavin D. Perkins, Jasmeet Soar, Jerry P. Nolan, Charles D. Deakin, Theresa M. Olasveengen, Therese Djärv, Claudio Sandroni, Bernd W. Böttiger, Carsten Lott and Tommaso Pellis and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Keith Couper

78 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Adult advanced life support

2021 568 citations Jasmeet Soar, Bernd W. Böttiger et al. Resuscitation profile →
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions

2021 127 citations Spyros D. Mentzelopoulos, Keith Couper et al. Resuscitation profile →
‘You can't walk through water without getting wet’ UK nurses’ distress and psychological health needs during the Covid-19 pandemic: A longitudinal interview study

2022 79 citations Jill Maben, Ruth Abrams et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Keith Couper United Kingdom	21	1.4k	399	382	336	302	84	2.0k
Malcolm Woollard United Kingdom	24	1.4k 1.0×	293 0.7×	370 1.0×	249 0.7×	281 0.9×	61	2.0k
Kosuke Kiyohara Japan	24	1.6k 1.1×	347 0.9×	359 0.9×	169 0.5×	220 0.7×	164	2.2k
Tyler F. Vadeboncoeur United States	26	1.8k 1.3×	431 1.1×	423 1.1×	237 0.7×	283 0.9×	66	2.0k
Dana Zive United States	26	1.8k 1.2×	311 0.8×	342 0.9×	143 0.4×	165 0.5×	59	2.3k
Chika Nishiyama Japan	28	2.1k 1.5×	476 1.2×	449 1.2×	267 0.8×	297 1.0×	92	2.4k
Andrew Lockey United Kingdom	26	1.6k 1.1×	253 0.6×	324 0.8×	188 0.6×	418 1.4×	86	2.1k
Åsa Axelsson Sweden	24	1.1k 0.8×	252 0.6×	230 0.6×	87 0.3×	218 0.7×	52	1.5k
Patrick Van de Voorde Belgium	16	990 0.7×	182 0.5×	209 0.5×	281 0.8×	143 0.5×	47	1.4k
Tasuku Matsuyama Japan	21	1.3k 0.9×	317 0.8×	286 0.7×	159 0.5×	167 0.6×	125	1.6k
Kyle J. Rehder United States	23	429 0.3×	428 1.1×	290 0.8×	714 2.1×	177 0.6×	69	1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Couper

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Couper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Couper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Couper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Couper

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Couper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Couper. The network helps show where Keith Couper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith Couper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith Couper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith Couper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keith Couper. Keith Couper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Elfeky, Adel, Adam Boulton, Rachel Court, et al.. (2025). Innovative ventilation technologies used in the intensive care unit for adults and children: a scoping review. NIHR Open Research. 5. 1–1.

Elfeky, Adel, Yen‐Fu Chen, Amy Grove, et al.. (2025). Perioperative oxygen therapy: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 135(5). 1456–1476. 1 indexed citations

Brown, Terry, et al.. (2025). Outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in nursing and care homes: a cohort study. Emergency Medicine Journal. 42(4). 243–248.

Yeung, Joyce, et al.. (2024). Variability in patient selection criteria across extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) systems: A systematic review. Resuscitation. 204. 110403–110403. 8 indexed citations

Couper, Keith, Lars W. Andersen, Ian R. Drennan, et al.. (2024). Intraosseous and intravenous vascular access during adult cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 207. 110481–110481. 2 indexed citations

Pocock, Helen, et al.. (2024). Systematic analysis of approaches used in cardiac arrest trials to inform relatives about trial enrolment of non-surviving patients. Emergency Medicine Journal. 42(8). 488–495.

Perkins, Gavin D., Robert W. Neumar, Cindy H. Hsu, et al.. (2024). Improving Outcomes After Post–Cardiac Arrest Brain Injury: A Scientific Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 201. 110196–110196. 10 indexed citations

Abrams, Ruth, Emma Rowland, Ruth Harris, et al.. (2023). Speaking up during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Nurses' experiences of organizational disregard and silence. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 79(6). 2189–2199. 20 indexed citations

Ball, Jane, Keith Couper, Jill Maben, et al.. (2022). The impact of COVID ‐19 on nurses ( ICON ) survey: Nurses' accounts of what would have helped to improve their working lives. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 79(1). 343–357. 11 indexed citations

10.

Mentzelopoulos, Spyros D., Keith Couper, Violetta Raffay, Jana Djakow, & Leo Bossaert. (2022). Evolution of European Resuscitation and End-of-Life Practices from 2015 to 2019: A Survey-Based Comparative Evaluation. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 11(14). 4005–4005. 1 indexed citations

11.

Lauridsen, Kasper Glerup, et al.. (2022). Pre-arrest prediction of survival following in-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Resuscitation. 179. 141–151. 10 indexed citations

12.

Perkins, Gavin D., Peter T. Morley, Jerry P. Nolan, et al.. (2020). International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation: COVID-19 consensus on science, treatment recommendations and task force insights. Resuscitation. 151. 145–147. 86 indexed citations

13.

Khan, Iftekhar, Mandy Maredza, Melina Dritsaki, et al.. (2020). Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study. PharmacoEconomics - Open. 4(4). 697–710. 4 indexed citations

14.

Soar, Jasmeet, Carsten Lott, Bernd W. Böttiger, et al.. (2020). Erweiterte lebensrettende Maßnahmen bei Erwachsenen: COVID-19-Leitlinien des European Resuscitation Council. PubMed Central. 2 indexed citations

15.

Goodwin, Laura D., Katie Samuel, Sarah Voss, et al.. (2020). Airway management during in-hospital cardiac arrest in adults: UK national survey and interview study with anaesthetic and intensive care trainees. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 22(3). 192–197. 1 indexed citations

16.

Couper, Keith, Rochelle Velho, Tom Quinn, et al.. (2018). Training approaches for the deployment of a mechanical chest compression device: a randomised controlled manikin study. BMJ Open. 8(2). e019009–e019009. 11 indexed citations

17.

Couper, Keith, Peter Kimani, Chris P Gale, et al.. (2018). Variation in outcome of hospitalised patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from acute coronary syndrome: a cohort study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(14). 1–116. 2 indexed citations

18.

Couper, Keith, Tom Quinn, Ranjit Lall, et al.. (2018). Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in the treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a non-shockable rhythm: a randomised controlled feasibility trial (COMPRESS-RCT). Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 26(1). 70–70. 3 indexed citations

19.

Couper, Keith, Peter Kimani, Benjamin S. Abella, et al.. (2015). The System-Wide Effect of Real-Time Audiovisual Feedback and Postevent Debriefing for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Critical Care Medicine. 43(11). 2321–2331. 47 indexed citations

20.

Couper, Keith, Mike Smyth, & Gavin D. Perkins. (2015). Mechanical devices for chest compression. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 21(3). 188–194. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact