Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
How is a Possession "Me" or "Not Me"? Characterizing Types and an Antecedent of Material Possession Attachment
1995519 citationsSusan Schultz Kleine, Robert E. Kleine et al.Journal of Consumer Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Kleine
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Kleine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Kleine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Kleine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Kleine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Kleine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Kleine. The network helps show where Robert E. Kleine may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert E. Kleine
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert E. Kleine.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert E. Kleine based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert E. Kleine. Robert E. Kleine is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kleine, Robert E. & Susan Schultz Kleine. (2000). Consumption and Self-Schema Changes Throughout the Identity Project Life Cycle. ACR North American Advances.51 indexed citations
Laverie, Debra A., Robert E. Kleine, & Susan Schultz Kleine. (1993). Linking Emotions and Values in Consumption Experiences: an Exploratory Study. ACR North American Advances. 20(1). 70–75.49 indexed citations
Kleine, Robert E., Susan Schultz Kleine, & Jerome B. Kernan. (1993). Mundane Consumption and the Self. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2(3). 209–235.44 indexed citations
Kleine, Robert E., et al.. (1992). Mundane Everyday Consumption and the Self: a Conceptual Orientation and Prospects For Consumer Research. ACR North American Advances.19 indexed citations
Kleine, Robert E., et al.. (1990). Ritual, Ritualized Behavior, and Habit: Refinements and Extensions of the Consumption Ritual Construct. ACR North American Advances.32 indexed citations
18.
Schultz, Susan, Robert E. Kleine, & Jerome B. Kernan. (1989). QThese Are a Few of My Favorite ThingsQ Toward an Explication of Attachment As a Consumer Behavior Construct. ACR North American Advances.117 indexed citations
19.
Kleine, Robert E. & Jerome B. Kernan. (1988). Measuring the Meaning of Consumption Objects: an Empirical Investigation. ACR North American Advances.20 indexed citations
20.
Kleine, Robert E. & Jerome B. Kernan. (1987). Toward an Epistemology of Consumption Symbolism: Some Preliminary Considerations. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.