Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results
1997591 citationsJames M. Hill, Michael H. McGuire et al.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volumeprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Lynn A. Crosby
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Lynn A. Crosby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lynn A. Crosby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lynn A. Crosby more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lynn A. Crosby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lynn A. Crosby. The network helps show where Lynn A. Crosby may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lynn A. Crosby
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lynn A. Crosby.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lynn A. Crosby based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lynn A. Crosby. Lynn A. Crosby is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Crosby, Lynn A., Thomas W. Wright, & Joseph D. Zuckerman. (2015). Revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty without Humeral Component Removal. A Preliminary Report on the Role of a Platform Humeral Component.. PubMed. 73 Suppl 1. S136–9.8 indexed citations
8.
Wright, Thomas W., et al.. (2015). Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Augments for Glenoid Wear. Comparison of Posterior Augments to Superior Augments.. PubMed. 73 Suppl 1. S124–8.41 indexed citations
9.
Neviaser, Robert J., Herbert Resch, Andrew S. Neviaser, & Lynn A. Crosby. (2015). Proximal humeral fractures: pin, plate, or replace.. PubMed. 64. 203–14.5 indexed citations
Crosby, Lynn A., et al.. (1997). Sporotrichal arthritis of the knee.. PubMed. 10(3). 171–4.2 indexed citations
15.
Hill, James M., Michael H. McGuire, & Lynn A. Crosby. (1997). Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume. 79(4). 537–539.591 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Schneider, Joanna & Lynn A. Crosby. (1996). Treatment of pediatric femur fracture with external fixation.. PubMed. 81(12). 432–5.1 indexed citations
17.
Crosby, Lynn A. & David G. Lewallen. (1995). Emergency care and transportation of the sick and injured. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).43 indexed citations
Crosby, Lynn A. & Matthew A. Mormino. (1992). Fracture of the lateral talar process.. PubMed. 77(12). 340–2.5 indexed citations
20.
Crosby, Lynn A., et al.. (1988). Intercondylar fracture of the humerus in an elderly patient--treatment with extension block splintage.. PubMed. 73(1). 10–2.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.