Robert Bradshaw
Impact in
- Safety Research top 0.5%
- Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
- Toxicology top 1%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Papers in
-
- Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods 23
- Genetics 20
- Forensic and Genetic Research 20
- Co-authors
- Simona Francese (23 shared papers)Malcolm R. Clench (10 shared papers)Rosalind Wolstenholme (8 shared papers)Stephen M. Bleay (7 shared papers)Leesa Ferguson (3 shared papers)Bipro Dubey (8 shared papers)Caroline Millman (7 shared papers)Martin Howarth (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Analyst (7 papers)Forensic Science International (3 papers)Forensic Chemistry (2 papers)Foods (2 papers)Science & Justice (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Robert Bradshaw
32 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Safety Research 760
- Toxicology 125
- Genetics 664
- Spectroscopy 300
- Archeology 142
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Bradshaw
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Bradshaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Bradshaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Bradshaw more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Bradshaw
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Bradshaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Bradshaw. The network helps show where Robert Bradshaw may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Bradshaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 147 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 95 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 90 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 76 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 73 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 63 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 53 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 46 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 46 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 43 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 42 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 34 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 33 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 32 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 25 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 25 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 22 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 17 |
About Robert Bradshaw
Robert Bradshaw is a scholar working on Safety Research, Genetics, Spectroscopy, Food Science and Archeology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (23 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (20 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (8 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (7 papers), Food composition and properties (4 papers), Phytase and its Applications (4 papers) and Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (760 citations), Toxicology (125 citations), Genetics (664 citations), Spectroscopy (300 citations) and Archeology (142 citations). Robert Bradshaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Simona Francese, Malcolm R. Clench, Rosalind Wolstenholme, Stephen M. Bleay, Leesa Ferguson, Bipro Dubey, Caroline Millman, Martin Howarth, Marcel de Puit and Robert D. Blackledge. Their work appears in journals such as The Analyst, Forensic Science International, Forensic Chemistry, Foods and Science & Justice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.