Robert Almeder
- Philosophy top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Health Professions
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- James M. HumberJames H. FetzerG. Lynn StephensNoretta KoertgeMatthias SteupMark T. NelsonJames MaffieROBERT L. ARRINGTON
- Topics
- Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (10 papers)Ethics in medical practice (9 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Robert Almeder
55 papers receiving 226 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Philosophy 77
- History and Philosophy of Science 50
- Sociology and Political Science 47
- General Health Professions 39
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 35
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Almeder
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Almeder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Almeder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Almeder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Almeder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Almeder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Almeder. The network helps show where Robert Almeder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Almeder
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Almeder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Almeder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Almeder. Robert Almeder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A Definition of Pragmatism | 6 |
| 2 | Rescher studies : a collection of essays on the philosophical work of Nicholas Rescher ; presented to him on the occasion of his 80th birthday | 0 |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Scrutinizing feminist epistemology : an examination of gender in science | 11 |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | Carnap and Quine on Empiricism | 1 |
| 9 | Liberal Feminism and Academic Feminism | 1 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | On Naturalizing Epistemology | 10 |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Robert Almeder
Robert Almeder is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and General Health Professions, having authored 66 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (10 papers), Ethics in medical practice (9 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (50 citations), Philosophy (77 citations) and General Psychology (5 citations). Robert Almeder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include James M. Humber, James H. Fetzer, G. Lynn Stephens, Noretta Koertge, Matthias Steup, Mark T. Nelson, James Maffie, ROBERT L. ARRINGTON, Nicholas Rescher and Christopher Hookway. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, The Philosophical Review and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.